Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities
- PMID: 15359000
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X04268955
Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities
Abstract
The standard gamble (SG) method and the time tradeoff (TTO) method are commonly used to measure utilities. However, they are distorted by biases due to loss aversion, scale compatibility, utility curvature for life duration, and probability weighting. This article applies corrections for these biases and provides new data on these biases and their corrections. The SG and TTO utilities of 6 rheumatoid arthritis health states were assessed for 45 healthy respondents. Various corrections of utilities were considered. The uncorrected TTO scores and the corrected (for utility curvature) TTO scores provided similar results. This article provides arguments suggesting that the TTO scores are biased upward rather than having balanced biases. The only downward bias in TTO scores was small and probably cannot offset the upward biases. TheTTOscores are higher than the theoretically most preferred correction of the SG, the mixed correction. These findings suggest that uncorrected SG scores, which are higher than TTO scores, are too high.
Similar articles
-
A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):447-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.688. Health Econ. 2002. PMID: 12112493
-
The construction of standard gamble utilities.Health Econ. 2008 Jan;17(1):31-40. doi: 10.1002/hec.1235. Health Econ. 2008. PMID: 17410521
-
The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method.J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):234-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Oct 30. J Health Econ. 2009. PMID: 19062114
-
Health utility bias: a systematic review and meta-analytic evaluation.Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):58-67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07312478. Epub 2008 Jun 12. Med Decis Making. 2010. PMID: 18556637 Review.
-
The Corrective Approach: Policy Implications of Recent Developments in QALY Measurement Based on Prospect Theory.Value Health. 2019 Jul;22(7):816-821. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 May 17. Value Health. 2019. PMID: 31277829 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision Analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.Semin Spine Surg. 2009 Dec;21(4):216-222. doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2009.08.003. Semin Spine Surg. 2009. PMID: 23966758 Free PMC article.
-
Preference values associated with stage III colon cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy.Qual Life Res. 2010 Apr;19(3):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9589-5. Qual Life Res. 2010. PMID: 20084462
-
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. Med Decis Making. 2006. PMID: 17099194 Free PMC article.
-
A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14. Qual Life Res. 2019. PMID: 31201730
-
Constantly proving the opposite? A test of CPTO using a broad time horizon and correcting for discounting.Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9917-4. Epub 2011 Apr 21. Qual Life Res. 2012. PMID: 21505879 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical