Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS)
- PMID: 15653582
- DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152333.75932.fe
Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) patients with carotid stenosis were randomized between endovascular treatment and endarterectomy. The rates of residual severe stenosis and restenosis and their contribution to recurrent symptoms was unclear.
Methods: Endovascular patients were treated by balloon angioplasty alone (88%) or stenting (22%). Patches were used in 63% of endarterectomy patients. Carotid stenosis was categorized as mild (0% to 49%), moderate (50% to 69%), severe (70% to 99%), or occluded, using standardized Doppler ultrasound criteria at the examination closest to 1 month (n=283) and 1 year (n=347) after treatment. Recurrent cerebrovascular symptoms during follow-up were analyzed.
Results: More patients had > or =70% stenosis of the ipsilateral carotid artery 1 year after endovascular treatment than after endarterectomy (18.5% versus 5.2%, P=0.0001). Residual severe stenosis was present in 6.5% of patients at 1 month after endovascular treatment. Between 1 month and 1 year, restenosis to > or =70% stenosis occurred in 10.5% of the endovascular group. After endarterectomy, 1.7% had residual severe stenosis at 1 month, and 2.5% developed severe restenosis. The results were significantly better after stenting compared with angioplasty alone at 1 month (P<0.001) but not at 1 year. Recurrent ipsilateral symptoms were more common in endovascular patients with severe stenosis (5/32 [15.6%]) compared with lesser degrees of stenosis at 1 year (11/141 [7.8%], P=0.02), but most were transient ischemic attacks and none were disabling or fatal strokes. There were no recurrent symptoms in the 9 endarterectomy patients with > or =70% stenosis at 1 year.
Conclusions: Carotid stenosis 1 year after endovascular treatment is partly explained by poor initial anatomical results and partly by restenosis. The majority of patients were treated by angioplasty without stenting. Further randomized studies are required to determine whether newer carotid stenting techniques are associated with a lower risk of restenosis. The low rate of recurrent stroke in both endovascular and endarterectomy patients suggests that treatment of restenosis should be limited to patients with recurrent symptoms, but long term follow up data are required.
Similar articles
-
Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):908-17. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70227-3. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Lancet Neurol. 2009. PMID: 19717347 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1. J Vasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24794275
-
Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial.Lancet Neurol. 2009 Oct;8(10):898-907. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70228-5. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Lancet Neurol. 2009. PMID: 19717345 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2:CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5 PMID: 22972047 Updated. Review.
-
Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting.Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):367-73. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152357.82843.9f. Epub 2004 Dec 29. Stroke. 2005. PMID: 15625299 Review.
Cited by
-
The use of intraoperative monitoring and treatment of symptomatic microemboli in carotid artery stenting: case report and discussion.Neuroradiology. 2007 Mar;49(3):265-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0172-2. Epub 2006 Nov 24. Neuroradiology. 2007. PMID: 17124612
-
Cerebral hemodynamic changes after carotid angioplasty and stenting.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):640-4. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007. PMID: 17416813 Free PMC article.
-
Society of vascular surgery vascular registry comparison of carotid artery stenting outcomes for atherosclerotic vs nonatherosclerotic carotid artery disease.J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5):1116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.082. Epub 2010 Mar 27. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20347551 Free PMC article.
-
High rate of restenosis after carotid artery stenting in patients with high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Medium-term follow-up.J Neurol. 2008 Sep;255(9):1309-14. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0875-x. Epub 2008 Sep 24. J Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18821044 Clinical Trial.
-
Anatomical Considerations for Endovascular Intervention for Extracranial Carotid Disease: A Review of the Literature and Recommended Guidelines.J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):3460. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113460. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 33121192 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical