Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 16022917
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.03.029
Randomized study of vinorelbine--gemcitabine versus vinorelbine--carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this trial was to compare two vinorelbine-based doublets with carboplatin (CBDCA-VC) or with gemcitabine (VG) in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients and methods: A total of 316 patients with advanced NSCLC previously untreated were randomized to either vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) D1,8 with carboplatin AUC 5 D1 (VC) or vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) with gemcitabine (VG) 1000 mg/m(2) both given D1,8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate with secondary parameters being survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tolerance and clinical benefit.
Results: The median number of cycles was four in each arm with a total of 1268 cycles. The objective response (OR) on intent-to-treat was 20.8% in VC and 28% in VG (p=0.15). Median PFS was 3.9 months in VC and 4.4 months (mo) in VG (p=0.18). Median survival was significantly longer (p=0.01) for VG with 11.5 mo compared to 8.6 mo in VC with 1 year survival at 48.9 and 34.4%, respectively. Tolerance was better in the VG arm as compared to the VC patients. Four toxic deaths were recorded in the VC group. Clinical benefit response rate was 32.4% compared to 40.9% in 111 and 110 evaluable patients in VC and VG, respectively.
Conclusion: VG compared to VC resulted in a similar overall response rate, favourable median survival and a better toxicity profile. For non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy, VG is a useful alternative.
Similar articles
-
Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 24;107(3):442-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.284. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22759880 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin versus ifosfamide+gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine and cisplatin followed by ifosfamide and gemcitabine in stage IIIB-IV non small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized phase III trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale.Lung Cancer. 2003 Feb;39(2):179-89. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(02)00444-0. Lung Cancer. 2003. PMID: 12581571 Clinical Trial.
-
Second-line paclitaxel/carboplatin versus vinorelbine/carboplatin in patients who have advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter randomized phase II study.Clin Lung Cancer. 2011 Mar;12(2):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Apr 11. Clin Lung Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21550556 Clinical Trial.
-
Carboplatin and vinorelbine in untreated locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer. 2001 May;32(2):173-8. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00218-x. Lung Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11325488 Review.
-
Triplet chemotherapy with vinorelbine, gemcitabine, and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study.Br J Cancer. 2002 Dec 2;87(12):1360-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600658. Br J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12454762 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of third-generation agents.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan;139(1):25-38. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1294-z. Epub 2012 Aug 5. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 22864816
-
Vinorelbine/carboplatin vs gemcitabine/carboplatin in advanced NSCLC shows similar efficacy, but different impact of toxicity.Br J Cancer. 2007 Aug 6;97(3):283-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603869. Epub 2007 Jun 26. Br J Cancer. 2007. PMID: 17595658 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD010463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010463.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26482542 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 24;107(3):442-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.284. Epub 2012 Jul 3. Br J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22759880 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in cancer patients treated with gemcitabine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;76(3):338-47. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12203. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23834355 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical