Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Aug;31(8):447-51.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.007302.

Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?

Affiliations

Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?

H Miyata et al. J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug.

Abstract

Telling people that they have cancer has a great impact on their lives, so many doctors are concerned about how they should inform patients about a cancer diagnosis and its prognosis. We conducted a general population survey in Japan to investigate people's preferences on receiving this information. There were no significant differences in respondents' preferences according to the seriousness of the cancer. Full disclosure of the diagnosis was preferred by 86.1% of the respondents, while 2.7% wanted non-disclosure. As for the initial provision of information, the majority preferred partial disclosure concerning the prospects of complete recovery (64.5%) and the expected length of survival (64.1%). Those who responded negatively to the statement, "If I am close to the end of my life, I want to be informed of the fact so I can choose my own way of life", were more likely to want non-disclosure on diagnosis. The results suggest that, at the first opportunity of providing information, a disclosure policy of giving patients full details of their diagnosis and some information on prognosis can satisfy the preferences of most patients. Contrary to popular belief, the seriousness of the cancer and people's demographic characteristics displayed little impact in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2001 Aug;33(1):29-36 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):473-6 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 1997 Apr;23(2):101-7 - PubMed
    1. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):37-42 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1992 Oct 7;268(13):1661-2 - PubMed
  NODES
twitter 2