Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 May;54(5):1568-72.
doi: 10.1002/art.21875.

Antibodies to ribosomal P proteins: a potential serologic marker for lupus membranous glomerulonephritis

Affiliations
Free article

Antibodies to ribosomal P proteins: a potential serologic marker for lupus membranous glomerulonephritis

Ana Patrícia do Nascimento et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 May.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relevance of antibodies to ribosomal P proteins (anti-P antibodies) in discriminating histopathologic patterns of lupus nephritis.

Methods: The study group comprised 81 consecutive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who underwent renal biopsy and for whom frozen serum was available at the time of biopsy. All biopsy specimens were reviewed in a blinded manner, according to the 2004 criteria of the International Society of Nephrology and the Renal Pathology Society. Anti-P antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)/immunoblot analysis, and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) was detected by indirect immunofluorescence/ELISA.

Results: Anti-P antibodies were detected in 18 patients (22%). The demographic and clinical features of patients with and those without anti-P antibodies were similar. Remarkably, analyses of biopsy specimens revealed that the frequency of anti-P antibodies in patients with class V lupus nephritis was higher than the frequency among patients with other classes of renal disease (72% versus 28%; P = 0.005). Accordingly, anti-P antibody-positive patients had a higher mean (+/-SD) proteinuria level compared with anti-P antibody-negative patients (6.4 +/- 4.8 versus 4.7 +/- 3.9 gm/dl; P = 0.046). Renal function was preserved in 6 of 7 patients who had both isolated anti-P antibodies and class V lupus nephritis. In contrast, anti-dsDNA was associated with proliferative-class lupus nephritis (P = 0.050) and higher creatinine levels (P = 0.014). Furthermore, 7 of 9 patients with isolated anti-P antibodies had class V lupus nephritis, and, more importantly, 5 of these 7 patients (71%) displayed a pure membranous pattern. Conversely, a tendency toward the predominance of class V lupus nephritis (67%) with concomitant proliferative lesions was observed when anti-P antibody was associated with anti-dsDNA.

Conclusion: Our data introduce anti-P antibody as a novel serologic marker for membranous lupus nephritis and support the notion that the presence of isolated anti-P antibodies may discriminate patients with pure class V lupus nephritis, whereas the simultaneous presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies suggests class V disease with concomitant proliferative lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
Association 2
INTERN 1
twitter 2