Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte
- PMID: 1682215
- PMCID: PMC1204577
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285
Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte
Abstract
Molecular marker loci were used to investigate the inheritance of morphological traits that distinguish maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) from a closely related wild relative, teosinte (Z. mays ssp. mexicana). Regression and interval mapping analyses gave largely congruent results concerning the numbers of loci controlling the morphological traits and the magnitudes of their effects; however, interval mapping tended to give larger estimates for the magnitudes of the effects of the morphological trait loci. This tendency was exaggerated for traits that were non-normally distributed. Variation for most inflorescence traits is controlled by one or two regions of the genome with large effects plus several other regions with relatively small effects. As such, the data are congruent with a mode of inheritance for most traits involving one or two major loci plus several minor loci. Regions of the genome with large effects on one trait consistently had smaller effects on several other traits, possibly as a result of pleiotropy. Most of the variation for the dramatic differences in inflorescence morphology between maize and teosinte is explained by five restricted regions of the genome. One of these regions encompasses a previously described gene, tb1 (teosinte branched), and the effects of this region on inflorescence architecture are similar to the known effects of tb1. Implications of this work for the genetic basis of morphological evolution in plants are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations.Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):559-70. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559. Genetics. 1993. PMID: 8325489 Free PMC article.
-
Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci.Evolution. 2002 Feb;56(2):273-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01337.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 11926495
-
Evidence for a natural allelic series at the maize domestication locus teosinte branched1.Genetics. 2012 Jul;191(3):951-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.138479. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Genetics. 2012. PMID: 22505628 Free PMC article.
-
The genetics of maize evolution.Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:37-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425. Annu Rev Genet. 2004. PMID: 15568971 Review.
-
Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize.Trends Genet. 1995 Dec;11(12):477-81. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89156-8. Trends Genet. 1995. PMID: 8533163 Review.
Cited by
-
Genomic, Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Tools to Study the Domestication of Plants and Animals: A Field Guide for Beginners.Front Genet. 2020 Jul 15;11:742. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00742. eCollection 2020. Front Genet. 2020. PMID: 32760427 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mapping quantitative trait loci onto a phylogenetic tree.Genetics. 2012 Sep;192(1):267-79. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.142448. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Genetics. 2012. PMID: 22745229 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of teosinte cytoplasmic genomes on maize phenotype.Genetics. 2005 Feb;169(2):863-80. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.027300. Genetics. 2005. PMID: 15731518 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic changes accompanying the domestication of Pisum sativum: is there a common genetic basis to the 'domestication syndrome' for legumes?Ann Bot. 2007 Nov;100(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm122. Epub 2007 Jul 28. Ann Bot. 2007. PMID: 17660515 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic variation for phenotypically invariant traits detected in teosinte: implications for the evolution of novel forms.Genetics. 2002 Jan;160(1):333-42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.1.333. Genetics. 2002. PMID: 11805068 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials