Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte
- PMID: 1682215
- PMCID: PMC1204577
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285
Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte
Abstract
Molecular marker loci were used to investigate the inheritance of morphological traits that distinguish maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) from a closely related wild relative, teosinte (Z. mays ssp. mexicana). Regression and interval mapping analyses gave largely congruent results concerning the numbers of loci controlling the morphological traits and the magnitudes of their effects; however, interval mapping tended to give larger estimates for the magnitudes of the effects of the morphological trait loci. This tendency was exaggerated for traits that were non-normally distributed. Variation for most inflorescence traits is controlled by one or two regions of the genome with large effects plus several other regions with relatively small effects. As such, the data are congruent with a mode of inheritance for most traits involving one or two major loci plus several minor loci. Regions of the genome with large effects on one trait consistently had smaller effects on several other traits, possibly as a result of pleiotropy. Most of the variation for the dramatic differences in inflorescence morphology between maize and teosinte is explained by five restricted regions of the genome. One of these regions encompasses a previously described gene, tb1 (teosinte branched), and the effects of this region on inflorescence architecture are similar to the known effects of tb1. Implications of this work for the genetic basis of morphological evolution in plants are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations.Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):559-70. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559. Genetics. 1993. PMID: 8325489 Free PMC article.
-
Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci.Evolution. 2002 Feb;56(2):273-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01337.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 11926495
-
Evidence for a natural allelic series at the maize domestication locus teosinte branched1.Genetics. 2012 Jul;191(3):951-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.138479. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Genetics. 2012. PMID: 22505628 Free PMC article.
-
The genetics of maize evolution.Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:37-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425. Annu Rev Genet. 2004. PMID: 15568971 Review.
-
Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize.Trends Genet. 1995 Dec;11(12):477-81. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89156-8. Trends Genet. 1995. PMID: 8533163 Review.
Cited by
-
Transcriptome Dynamics of the Inflorescence in Reciprocally Formed Allopolyploid Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae).Front Genet. 2020 Aug 6;11:888. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00888. eCollection 2020. Front Genet. 2020. PMID: 32849847 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic architecture of a feeding adaptation: garter snake (Thamnophis) resistance to tetrodotoxin bearing prey.Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Nov 7;277(1698):3317-25. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0748. Epub 2010 Jun 3. Proc Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20522513 Free PMC article.
-
DNA sequence diversity and the origin of cultivated safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.; Asteraceae).BMC Plant Biol. 2007 Nov 6;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-60. BMC Plant Biol. 2007. PMID: 17986334 Free PMC article.
-
Architectural evolution and its implications for domestication in grasses.Ann Bot. 2007 Nov;100(5):941-50. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm040. Epub 2007 May 3. Ann Bot. 2007. PMID: 17478546 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neo-Domestication of an Interspecific Tetraploid Helianthus annuus × Helianthus tuberous Population That Segregates for Perennial Habit.Genes (Basel). 2018 Aug 21;9(9):422. doi: 10.3390/genes9090422. Genes (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30134600 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials