Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte
- PMID: 1682215
- PMCID: PMC1204577
- DOI: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.285
Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte
Abstract
Molecular marker loci were used to investigate the inheritance of morphological traits that distinguish maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) from a closely related wild relative, teosinte (Z. mays ssp. mexicana). Regression and interval mapping analyses gave largely congruent results concerning the numbers of loci controlling the morphological traits and the magnitudes of their effects; however, interval mapping tended to give larger estimates for the magnitudes of the effects of the morphological trait loci. This tendency was exaggerated for traits that were non-normally distributed. Variation for most inflorescence traits is controlled by one or two regions of the genome with large effects plus several other regions with relatively small effects. As such, the data are congruent with a mode of inheritance for most traits involving one or two major loci plus several minor loci. Regions of the genome with large effects on one trait consistently had smaller effects on several other traits, possibly as a result of pleiotropy. Most of the variation for the dramatic differences in inflorescence morphology between maize and teosinte is explained by five restricted regions of the genome. One of these regions encompasses a previously described gene, tb1 (teosinte branched), and the effects of this region on inflorescence architecture are similar to the known effects of tb1. Implications of this work for the genetic basis of morphological evolution in plants are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations.Genetics. 1993 Jun;134(2):559-70. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.2.559. Genetics. 1993. PMID: 8325489 Free PMC article.
-
Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci.Evolution. 2002 Feb;56(2):273-83. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01337.x. Evolution. 2002. PMID: 11926495
-
Evidence for a natural allelic series at the maize domestication locus teosinte branched1.Genetics. 2012 Jul;191(3):951-8. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.138479. Epub 2012 Apr 13. Genetics. 2012. PMID: 22505628 Free PMC article.
-
The genetics of maize evolution.Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:37-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092425. Annu Rev Genet. 2004. PMID: 15568971 Review.
-
Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize.Trends Genet. 1995 Dec;11(12):477-81. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89156-8. Trends Genet. 1995. PMID: 8533163 Review.
Cited by
-
From many, one: genetic control of prolificacy during maize domestication.PLoS Genet. 2013 Jun;9(6):e1003604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003604. Epub 2013 Jun 27. PLoS Genet. 2013. PMID: 23825971 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait.Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):2093-107. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.2093. Genetics. 2000. PMID: 11102398 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic consequences of selection during the evolution of cultivated sunflower.Genetics. 2005 Dec;171(4):1933-40. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.039057. Epub 2005 Jun 18. Genetics. 2005. PMID: 15965259 Free PMC article.
-
Combining QTL-seq and linkage mapping to uncover the genetic basis of single vs. paired spikelets in the advanced populations of two-ranked maize×teosinte.BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Dec 4;21(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03353-3. BMC Plant Biol. 2021. PMID: 34863103 Free PMC article.
-
Epistasis in measured genotypes: Drosophila P-element insertions.Genetics. 1997 Sep;147(1):157-63. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.1.157. Genetics. 1997. PMID: 9286676 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials