Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Sep;11(3-4):339-55.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00032.x.

Genetically selected Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) rats: an animal model to study the neurobiology of alcoholism

Affiliations
Review

Genetically selected Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) rats: an animal model to study the neurobiology of alcoholism

Roberto Ciccocioppo et al. Addict Biol. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

The present article provides an up-to-date review summarizing almost 18 years of research in genetically selected Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) rats. The results of this work demonstrate that msP rats have natural preference for ethanol characterized by a spontaneous binge-type of drinking that leads to pharmacologically significant blood ethanol levels. This rat line is highly vulnerable to relapse and presentation of stimuli predictive of alcohol availability or foot-shock stress can reinstate extinguished drug-seeking up to 8 months from the last alcohol experience. The msP rat is highly sensitive to stress, shows an anxious phenotype and has depressive-like symptoms that recover following ethanol drinking. Interestingly, these animals have an up-regulated corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) receptor 1 system. Clinical studies have shown that alcoholic patients often drink ethanol in the attempt to self-medicate from negative affective states and to search for anxiety relief. We propose that msP rats represent an animal model that largely mimics the human alcoholic population that due to poor ability to engage in stress-coping strategies drink ethanol as a tension relief strategy and for self-medication purposes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical pattern of 10% ethanol consumption in three different msP rats. Drinking was recorded on the first day (day 1) and seventh day (day 7) of alcohol access. Measurements were carried out every hour during the dark phase of the light/dark cycle. Ethanol intake is expressed as g/kg to reduce the influence of differences in body weight
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alcohol-seeking behavior of msP rats induced by (a) foot-shock stress and (b) re-exposure to the alcohol (CS+/S+)- or water (CS/S)-paired cues. Animals were tested for reinstatement immediately after extinction (Immediate Relapse) or after 4 and 8 months. Between the different relapse the animals were kept in their home cages in the vivarium. Each test was preceded by an extinction cycle to re-establish responding consistent with the extinction criterion. Values represent the mean (± SEM) number of responses at the active lever. Difference from extinction was set at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01
Figure 3
Figure 3
Performance of msP and Wistar rats on alcohol self-administration under: (a) fixed ratio 1 schedule and (b) progressive ratio schedule. In the progressive ratio the number of responses at the lever required to obtain a single dose (0.1 ml) of 10% w/v ethanol increases progressively. (c) Behavior of msP and Wistar rats under repeated reinstatement tests. Animals were first trained to discriminate the availability of ethanol versus water in the presence of cues predictive of their availability (CS+/S+ and CS/S, respectively). At completion of the discrimination phase, and after an extinction period (no cues present), the CS+/S+ and/or CS/S were re-presented to the animals and their behavior motivated by the stimuli predictive of ethanol (CS+/S+) versus water (CS+/S+) availability was monitored. For the reinstatement test fluids were not available. Values represent the mean (± SEM) number of responses at the active lever. Statistical difference was set at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 between msP and Wistar rats, and #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 from extinction
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heatmap visualization of significant genes related to functional groups. Statistically enriched GO Ontology terms and KEGG pathways were placed against genes differentially between the two strains. Red color indicates the functional categories correlated with the genes
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mapk signaling pathway from KEGG. Red shaded genes are differentially expressed in Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) compared with Wistars

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addolorato G, Leggio L, Abenavoli L, DeLorenzi G, Parente A, Caputo F, Janiri L, Capristo E, Rapaccini GL, Gasbarrini G. Suppression of alcohol delirium tremens by baclofen administration: a case report. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2003;26:258–262. - PubMed
    1. Arlinde C, Sommer W, Bjork K, Reimers M, Hyytia P, Kiianmaa K, Heilig M. A cluster of differentially expressed signal transduction genes identified by microarray analysis in a rat genetic model of alcoholism. Pharmacogenomics J. 2004;4:208–218. - PubMed
    1. Boening JA, Lesch OM, Spanagel R, Wolffgramm J, Narita M, Sinclair D, Mason BJ, Wiesbeck GA. Pharmacological relapse prevention in alcohol dependence: from animal models to clinical trials. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;2(5 Suppl ISBRA):127S–131S. - PubMed
    1. Boothby LA, Doering PL. Acamprosate for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Clin Ther. 2005;27:695–714. - PubMed
    1. Chen YC, Lu RB, Peng GS, Wang MF, Wang HK, Ko HC, Chang YC, Lu JJ, Li TK, Yin SJ. Alcohol metabolism and cardiovascular response in an alcoholic patient homozygous for the ALDH2*2 variant gene allele. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999;23:1853–1860. - PubMed

Publication types

  NODES
admin 5
twitter 2