Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Sep;99(9):1013-23.

Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research

Affiliations
Review

Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research

Vickie L Shavers. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007 Sep.

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) is frequently implicated as a contributor to the disparate health observed among racial/ ethnic minorities, women and elderly populations. Findings from studies that examine the role of SES and health disparities, however, have provided inconsistent results. This is due in part to the: 1) lack of precision and reliability of measures; 2) difficulty with the collection of individual SES data; 3) the dynamic nature of SES over a lifetime; 4) the classification of women, children, retired and unemployed persons; 5) lack of or poor correlation between individual SES measures; and 6) and inaccurate or misleading interpretation of study results. Choosing the best variable or approach for measuring SES is dependent in part on its relevance to the population and outcomes under study. Many of the commonly used compositional and contextual SES measures are limited in terms of their usefulness for examining the effect of SES on outcomes in analyses of data that include population subgroups known to experience health disparities. This article describes SES measures, strengths and limitations of specific approaches and methodological issues related to the analysis and interpretation of studies that examine SES and health disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1403-11 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:497-500 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;47(8):903-9 - PubMed
    1. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Mar;60(2):S93-S101 - PubMed
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1991 Dec;32(4):342-56 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
Association 1
twitter 2