Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Jul-Aug;6(4):285-301.
doi: 10.2165/00002018-199106040-00006.

Risk-benefit assessment of anaesthetic agents in the puerperium

J Kanto  1
Affiliations
Review

Risk-benefit assessment of anaesthetic agents in the puerperium

J Kanto. Drug Saf. 1991 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

A critical evaluation of anaesthetic agents in the puerperium is difficult because systematic, relevant studies are still lacking. Current knowledge of the effects of different agents used in labour and caesarean section indicates that significant residual effects on the mother and newborn are limited. In the early puerperium, based on physiological and/or hormonal changes, the mother could be more sensitive to inhalational anaesthetic agents and local analgesics. To date there is no evidence that any anaesthetic agent is excreted in breast milk in clinically significant amounts when given as a single dose. The only exception is perhaps in the case of very premature neonates whose mothers have had multidrug therapy before labour. Even then the importance of breast milk should be carefully assessed against possible adverse drug effect. However, repeated administration of long-acting benzodiazepines and continuous epidural administration of pethidine (meperidine) can have adverse effects on the neonate. The essential conclusion of this review is that breast-feeding is best. The different anaesthetic agents are excreted in the milk in amounts so low that detrimental effects on the neonate should not be expected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1988 Apr;14(4):189-216 - PubMed
    1. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1990 Dec;19(6):425-33 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Jul;88(7):711-7 - PubMed
    1. Drug Metab Rev. 1983;14(4):619-52 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1986 Aug;65(8):897-900 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
admin 2
twitter 2