Evaluation of the effects of laparotomy and laparoscopy on the immune system in intra-abdominal sepsis--a review
- PMID: 19160143
- DOI: 10.1080/08941930802438914
Evaluation of the effects of laparotomy and laparoscopy on the immune system in intra-abdominal sepsis--a review
Abstract
This review portrays the most common experimental models of intra-abdominal sepsis. Additionally, it outlines the facts that distinguish laparotomy from laparoscopy, in respect to the immune response, when comparing these two techniques in experimental models of intra-abdominal sepsis. It describes the consequences of pneumoperitoneum and trauma produced by laparoscopy or laparotomy, respectively, on bacterial translocation and immunity. Furthermore, we report the few efforts that have been made in clinical settings, where surgeons have attempted to utilize laparoscopy as a therapeutic module when treating peritonitis or sepsis of abdominal origin. Certainly there is a need for more research in order to fortify the role of pneumoperitoneum in sepsis of abdominal origin. It seems that minimally invasive surgery will inevitably gain acceptance by surgeons, as evidence points that by inflicting less trauma the healing response is expected to be more efficient, especially in septic patients.
Similar articles
-
Effects of laparoscopic vs laparotomy treatment of E. coli peritonitis on hemodynamic responses in a porcine model.Surg Endosc. 1999 Oct;13(10):1001-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649901156. Surg Endosc. 1999. PMID: 10526036
-
Dissemination of bacteria labeled with technetium-99m after laparotomy and abdominal insufflation with different CO2 pressures on rats.Acta Cir Bras. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-54. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502008000100009. Acta Cir Bras. 2008. PMID: 18278393
-
CO(2) pneumoperitoneum prolongs survival in an animal model of peritonitis compared to laparotomy.J Surg Res. 2009 Mar;152(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.030. Epub 2008 Mar 18. J Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 18499131
-
Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection.J Chemother. 2001 Nov;13 Spec No 1(1):17-22. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.Supplement-2.17. J Chemother. 2001. PMID: 11936362 Review.
-
[Intra-abdominal sepsis: surgical management].Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1995 Jan-Apr;15(1):62-73. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1995. PMID: 7734711 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Immune Protection against Lethal Fungal-Bacterial Intra-Abdominal Infections.mBio. 2018 Jan 16;9(1):e01472-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01472-17. mBio. 2018. PMID: 29339423 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer.JSLS. 2013 Jan-Mar;17(1):15-22. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13517013317752. JSLS. 2013. PMID: 23743368 Free PMC article.
-
Serum Interleukin-8 in Patients with Different Origin of Intra-Abdominal Infections in Perioperative Period.Med Sci (Basel). 2019 Sep 8;7(9):94. doi: 10.3390/medsci7090094. Med Sci (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31500348 Free PMC article.
-
Morphogenesis is not required for Candida albicans-Staphylococcus aureus intra-abdominal infection-mediated dissemination and lethal sepsis.Infect Immun. 2014 Aug;82(8):3426-35. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01746-14. Epub 2014 Jun 2. Infect Immun. 2014. PMID: 24891104 Free PMC article.
-
LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY DOES NOT INCREASE THE RATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY along with a lower rate of perforated appendicitis - RESULTS IN 1899 PATIENTS at Zagreb UHC.Acta Clin Croat. 2018 Sep;57(3):503-509. doi: 10.20471/acc.2018.57.03.14. Acta Clin Croat. 2018. PMID: 31168184 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
