Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Mar;20(2):153-7.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0030.

Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Preliminary face and construct validation study of a virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer

Ganesh Sankaranarayanan et al. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer (VBLaST) is a developing virtual-reality-based surgical skill training system that incorporates several of the tasks of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) training system. This study aimed to evaluate the face and construct validity of the VBLaST system.

Materials and methods: Thirty-nine subjects were voluntarily recruited at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA) and classified into two groups: experts (PGY 5, fellow and practicing surgeons) and novice (PGY 1-4). They were then asked to perform three FLS tasks, consisting of peg transfer, pattern cutting, and endoloop, on both the VBLaST and FLS systems. The VBLaST performance scores were automatically computed, while the FLS scores were rated by a trained evaluator. Face validity was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, varying from not realistic/useful (1) to very realistic/useful (5).

Results: Face-validity scores showed that the VBLaST system was significantly realistic in portraying the three FLS tasks (3.95 +/- 0.909), as well as the reality in trocar placement and tool movements (3.67 +/- 0.874). Construct-validity results show that VBLaST was able to differentiate between the expert and novice group (P = 0.015). However, of the two tasks used for evaluating VBLaST, only the peg-transfer task showed a significant difference between the expert and novice groups (P = 0.003). Spearman correlation coefficient analysis between the two scores showed significant correlation for the peg-transfer task (Spearman coefficient 0.364; P = 0.023).

Conclusions: VBLaST demonstrated significant face and construct validity. A further set of studies, involving improvement to the current VBLaST system, is needed to thoroughly demonstrate face and construct validity for all the tasks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The three FLS tasks in trainer box and VBLaST. (A) and (D) peg transfer; (B) and (E) endoloop; (C) and (F) pattern cutting.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Overall VBLaST setup with tool interface and display.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
(A) Ligation loop interface attached to the (B) PHANToM Omni device.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Powers TW. Murayama KM. Toyama M. Murphy S. Denham EW., 3rd Derossis AM. Joehl RJ. House staff performance is improved by participation in a laparoscopic skills curriculum. Am J Surg. 2002;184:626–629. - PubMed
    1. Peters JH. Fried GM. Swanstrom LL. Soper NJ. Sillin LF. Schirmer B. Hoffman K. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 2004;135:21–27. and the SAGES FLS Committee. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher AG. Richie K. McClure N. McGuigan J. Objective psychomotor assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg. 2001;25:1478–1483. - PubMed
    1. Grantcharov TP. Bardram L. Funch-Jensen P. Rosenberg J. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2003;185:146–149. - PubMed
    1. Grantcharov TP. Rosenberg J. Pahle E. Funch-Jensen P. Virtual reality computer simulation. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:242–244. - PubMed

Publication types

  NODES
twitter 2