Individual variability in self-reported improvement for depressed psychiatric inpatients on the MCMI-II
- PMID: 2030128
- DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(199103)47:2<227::aid-jclp2270470208>3.0.co;2-f
Individual variability in self-reported improvement for depressed psychiatric inpatients on the MCMI-II
Abstract
This study evaluated self-reported symptom improvement on the MCM-II Dysthymia (D) scale for 109 depressed psychiatric inpatients. Rather than presenting the findings in traditional "group mean" format, data were analyzed to highlight the variability of clinical improvement for individual patients. Two criteria for judging clinically significant improvement (Jacobson, Follette, & Revenstorf, 1984) were employed, namely, that the client move from the dysfunctional to functional range during treatment and that the change between pretest and posttest be statistically reliable. Results indicated that 39 (35.8%) of the 109 patients met these criteria.
Similar articles
-
The MCMI-II depression scales: do they assist in the differential prediction of depressive disorders?J Pers Assess. 1991 Jun;56(3):478-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5603_9. J Pers Assess. 1991. PMID: 1865306
-
Contributions of discriminant analysis to differential diagnosis by self-report.J Pers Assess. 1994 Apr;62(2):320-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6202_12. J Pers Assess. 1994. PMID: 8189340
-
Clinically significant change in psychotherapy for depressive disorders.J Affect Disord. 2009 May;115(1-2):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.09.009. Epub 2008 Oct 11. J Affect Disord. 2009. PMID: 18851885 Clinical Trial.
-
The diagnosis and assessment of depression, mania, and psychosis by self-report.J Pers Assess. 1993 Feb;60(1):1-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6001_1. J Pers Assess. 1993. PMID: 8433259 Review.
-
Depressive experiences in inpatients with borderline personality disorder.Psychiatr Q. 2007 Jun;78(2):129-43. doi: 10.1007/s11126-006-9033-8. Psychiatr Q. 2007. PMID: 17347875 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous