Individuals with diabetes preferred that future trials use patient-important outcomes and provide pragmatic inferences
- PMID: 21109401
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.005
Individuals with diabetes preferred that future trials use patient-important outcomes and provide pragmatic inferences
Abstract
Objective: We sought to examine patients' preferences regarding the design of diabetes trials. Specifically, do patients prefer trials to focus on patient-important outcomes (vs. surrogate outcomes) and provide practical/pragmatic answers (vs. mechanistic/explanatory answers)?
Study design and setting: We mailed a questionnaire to a stratified random sample of 4,796 patients with diabetes receiving care from 371 primary care clinicians in the US Midwest. Medical record review provided data on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and multiple regression techniques were used for analysis.
Results: We received completed surveys from 2,036 patients (response rate of 42.5%). On average, respondents were 65 years old, had 11 years of diabetes, and had excellent glycemic control (HbA1c=7%). Most patients (>75%) chose patient-important outcomes rather than HbA1c as their first choice for a trial primary outcome and preferred a practical trial design. Patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c>8.0%) were more likely to prefer HbA1c as a primary end point (odds ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.1, 2.1).
Conclusion: Individuals with diabetes report a strong preference for practical trials measuring the effect of treatments on patient-important outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first report of patients endorsing key elements of the comparative effectiveness agenda.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112. JAMA Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26182303 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative hemoglobin A1c as a predictor of deep infection following single-level lumbar decompression in patients with diabetes.Spine J. 2017 Aug;17(8):1100-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 22. Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28343046
-
Effect of patients' risks and preferences on health gains with plasma glucose level lowering in type 2 diabetes mellitus.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1227-34. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2894. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24979148 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD004714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004714.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 14;4:CD004714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004714.pub4 PMID: 26545069 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
[HEMOGLOBIN A1c AND THE QUALITY OF DIABETES CARE].Lijec Vjesn. 2015 Sep-Oct;137(9-10):292-6. Lijec Vjesn. 2015. PMID: 26749952 Review. Croatian.
Cited by
-
New approaches to providing individualized diabetes care in the 21st century.Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015;11(4):222-30. doi: 10.2174/1573399811666150421110316. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015. PMID: 25901504 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05442-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32600321 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes that patients perceive and value are systematically unassessed in randomized clinical trials of endocrine-related illnesses: a systematic review.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:140-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30253220 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Selecting Core Outcomes for Randomised Effectiveness trials In Type 2 diabetes (SCORE-IT): a patient and healthcare professional consensus on a core outcome set for type 2 diabetes.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Dec 29;7(1):e000700. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000700. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019. PMID: 31908789 Free PMC article.
-
Priority setting for children and young people with chronic conditions and disabilities.Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1562-1574. doi: 10.1111/hex.13761. Epub 2023 Apr 20. Health Expect. 2023. PMID: 37078632 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical