Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 7;472(7341):90-4.
doi: 10.1038/nature09807. Epub 2011 Mar 13.

Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing

Affiliations

Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing

Nicholas Navin et al. Nature. .

Abstract

Genomic analysis provides insights into the role of copy number variation in disease, but most methods are not designed to resolve mixed populations of cells. In tumours, where genetic heterogeneity is common, very important information may be lost that would be useful for reconstructing evolutionary history. Here we show that with flow-sorted nuclei, whole genome amplification and next generation sequencing we can accurately quantify genomic copy number within an individual nucleus. We apply single-nucleus sequencing to investigate tumour population structure and evolution in two human breast cancer cases. Analysis of 100 single cells from a polygenomic tumour revealed three distinct clonal subpopulations that probably represent sequential clonal expansions. Additional analysis of 100 single cells from a monogenomic primary tumour and its liver metastasis indicated that a single clonal expansion formed the primary tumour and seeded the metastasis. In both primary tumours, we also identified an unexpectedly abundant subpopulation of genetically diverse 'pseudodiploid' cells that do not travel to the metastatic site. In contrast to gradual models of tumour progression, our data indicate that tumours grow by punctuated clonal expansions with few persistent intermediates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparison of SK-BR-3 Single Cells to Millions
(a) The integer copy number profile for a single SK-BR-3 cell is shown compared to (b) a sequence count profile using millions of cells. (c–d) A region on chromosome 8q13.2-q24.23 is plotted showing the integer copy number profile (in red or blue) and a ratio of raw bin counts in grey for (c) a single cell, and (d) a million cells (e) A heatmap of SK-BR-3 copy number profiles comparing a million cell sample (SM) to seven single cells (S1–S7). (f) A heatmap of SKN1 normal fibroblast profiles comparing a million cell sample (FM) to seven single cells (F1–F7).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Analysis of 100 Single Cells from Polygenomic Breast Tumor
(a) T10 was macro-dissected into 12 sectors, and nuclei were isolated from six sectors and flow-sorted by ploidy. FACS profiles show four distributions of ploidy (F1–F4) which were gated to isolate 100 single cells. (b) Neighbor-joining tree of integer copy number profiles showing four major branches of evolution (c) Phylogenetic tree of consensus profiles show the common ancestors and evolutionary distance between subpopulations. Integer copy number profiles from single cells are displayed below, and pie charts indicate the percentage of cells that constitute each subpopulation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Analysis of 100 Single Cells from a Monogenomic Breast Tumor and its Liver Metastasis
(a–b) Primary breast tumor T16P was macro-dissected and 52 nuclei were isolated from three sectors for FACS showing two distributions of ploidy (F1 and F2). (b) Liver metastasis T16M was macro-dissected and 48 nuclei were isolated from three sectors for FACS also showing two ploidy distributions (F1 and F2). (c) Neighbor-joining tree of combined integer copy number profiles from the primary and the metastatic tumors. (d) Comparison of primary and metastatic aneuploid consensus copy number profiles.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Genetically Diverse Pseudodiploid Cells in the Diploid Fractions of Tumors
(a–d) Hematoxylin and eosin stained tissues sections are displayed in the upper panels with normal (N) and tumor (T) cells percentages indicated. Lower rows display bin counts and copy number profiles of single cells isolated from the 2N gated ploidy distributions, and the total number of cells analyzed is indicated below each column. The columns are: (a) normal breast tissue cells; (b) pseudodiploid cells in T10; (c) pseudodiploid cells in T16P; and (d) diploid-gated nuclei from T16M. (e) Bin counts and copy number profiles of single cells from the major aneuploid tumor subpopulations.

Comment in

  • Genomics: one cell at a time.
    Alderton GK. Alderton GK. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 May;11(5):312. doi: 10.1038/nrc3060. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21508964 No abstract available.

Similar articles

  • Inferring tumor progression from genomic heterogeneity.
    Navin N, Krasnitz A, Rodgers L, Cook K, Meth J, Kendall J, Riggs M, Eberling Y, Troge J, Grubor V, Levy D, Lundin P, Månér S, Zetterberg A, Hicks J, Wigler M. Navin N, et al. Genome Res. 2010 Jan;20(1):68-80. doi: 10.1101/gr.099622.109. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Genome Res. 2010. PMID: 19903760 Free PMC article.
  • Punctuated copy number evolution and clonal stasis in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Gao R, Davis A, McDonald TO, Sei E, Shi X, Wang Y, Tsai PC, Casasent A, Waters J, Zhang H, Meric-Bernstam F, Michor F, Navin NE. Gao R, et al. Nat Genet. 2016 Oct;48(10):1119-30. doi: 10.1038/ng.3641. Epub 2016 Aug 15. Nat Genet. 2016. PMID: 27526321 Free PMC article.
  • Dynamics of genomic clones in breast cancer patient xenografts at single-cell resolution.
    Eirew P, Steif A, Khattra J, Ha G, Yap D, Farahani H, Gelmon K, Chia S, Mar C, Wan A, Laks E, Biele J, Shumansky K, Rosner J, McPherson A, Nielsen C, Roth AJ, Lefebvre C, Bashashati A, de Souza C, Siu C, Aniba R, Brimhall J, Oloumi A, Osako T, Bruna A, Sandoval JL, Algara T, Greenwood W, Leung K, Cheng H, Xue H, Wang Y, Lin D, Mungall AJ, Moore R, Zhao Y, Lorette J, Nguyen L, Huntsman D, Eaves CJ, Hansen C, Marra MA, Caldas C, Shah SP, Aparicio S. Eirew P, et al. Nature. 2015 Feb 19;518(7539):422-6. doi: 10.1038/nature13952. Epub 2014 Nov 26. Nature. 2015. PMID: 25470049 Free PMC article.
  • Genome evolution in ductal carcinoma in situ: invasion of the clones.
    Casasent AK, Edgerton M, Navin NE. Casasent AK, et al. J Pathol. 2017 Jan;241(2):208-218. doi: 10.1002/path.4840. Epub 2016 Nov 27. J Pathol. 2017. PMID: 27861897 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications.
    Manier S, Salem KZ, Park J, Landau DA, Getz G, Ghobrial IM. Manier S, et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;14(2):100-113. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.122. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27531699 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Park SY, Gonen M, Kim HJ, Michor F, Polyak K. Cellular and genetic diversity in the progression of in situ human breast carcinomas to an invasive phenotype. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:636–644. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torres L, et al. Intratumor genomic heterogeneity in breast cancer with clonal divergence between primary carcinomas and lymph node metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102:143–155. - PubMed
    1. Farabegoli F, et al. Clone heterogeneity in diploid and aneuploid breast carcinomas as detected by FISH. Cytometry. 2001;46:50–56. - PubMed
    1. Chiang DY, et al. High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods. 2009;6:99–103. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoon S, Xuan Z, Makarov V, Ye K, Sebat J. Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res. 2009;19:1586–1592. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

  NODES
twitter 2