Age and gender differences in various topographical orientation strategies
- PMID: 21803342
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.07.005
Age and gender differences in various topographical orientation strategies
Abstract
Orientation in the environment can draw on a variety of cognitive strategies. We asked 634 healthy volunteers to perform a comprehensive battery administered through an internet website (www.gettinglost.ca), testing different orientation strategies in virtual environments to determine the effect of age and gender upon these skills. Older participants (46-67years of age) performed worse than younger participants (18-30 or 31-45years of age) in all orientation skills assessed, including landmark recognition, integration of body-centered information, forming association between landmarks and body turns, and the formation and use of a cognitive map. Among all tests, however, the ability to form cognitive maps resulted to be the significant factor best at predicting the individuals' age group. Gender effects were stable across age and dissociated for task, with males better than females for cognitive map formation and use as well as for path reversal, an orientation task that does not require the processing of visual landmarks during navigation. We conclude that age-related declines in navigation are common across all orientation strategies and confirm gender-specific effects in different spatial domains.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Mental imagery skills and topographical orientation in humans: a correlation study.Behav Brain Res. 2008 Oct 10;192(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.014. Epub 2008 Apr 22. Behav Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18502521 Clinical Trial.
-
Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps.Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 23;196(2):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.040. Epub 2008 Sep 4. Behav Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 18817815
-
Age- and sex-related disturbance in a battery of sensorimotor and cognitive tasks in Kunming mice.Physiol Behav. 2004 Dec 15;83(3):531-41. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.09.012. Physiol Behav. 2004. PMID: 15581676
-
What is geometric information and how do animals use it?Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):339-43. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Nov 24. Behav Processes. 2009. PMID: 19084055 Review.
-
Of mice and men: building blocks in cognitive mapping.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Nov;47:393-409. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 28. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014. PMID: 25265515 Review.
Cited by
-
Cognitive mapping in humans and its relationship to other orientation skills.Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(3):359-72. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3316-0. Epub 2012 Nov 3. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23124810
-
Sex and menstrual cycle influence human spatial navigation strategies and performance.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 11;13(1):14953. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41153-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37696837 Free PMC article.
-
Sex Differences in Spatial Memory: Comparison of Three Tasks Using the Same Virtual Context.Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 7;11(6):757. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060757. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 34200351 Free PMC article.
-
Complexity As Key to Designing Cognitive-Friendly Environments for Older People.Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 30;7:1329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01329. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27625629 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extrahippocampal Contributions to Age-Related Changes in Spatial Navigation Ability.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 10;12:272. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00272. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30042665 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
