Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Oct 1;25(19):1999-2010.
doi: 10.1101/gad.17558811.

The dynamic nature of autophagy in cancer

Affiliations
Review

The dynamic nature of autophagy in cancer

Alec C Kimmelman. Genes Dev. .

Abstract

Macroautophagy (referred to hereafter as autophagy) is a highly regulated cellular process that serves to remove damaged proteins and organelles from the cell. Autophagy contributes to an array of normal and pathological processes, and has recently emerged as a key regulator of multiple aspects of cancer biology. The role of autophagy in cancer is complex and is likely dependent on tumor type, stage, and genetic context. This complexity is illustrated by the identification of settings where autophagy acts potently to either promote or inhibit tumorigenesis. In this review, I discuss the underlying basis for these opposing functions and propose a model suggesting a dynamic role for autophagy in malignancy. Collectively, the data point to autophagy as serving as a barrier to limit tumor initiation. Once neoplastic lesions are established, it appears that adaptive changes occur that now result in positive roles for autophagy in malignant progression and in subsequent tumor maintenance. Remarkably, constitutive activation of autophagy is critical for continued growth of some tumors, serving to both reduce oxidative stress and provide key intermediates to sustain cell metabolism. Autophagy is also induced in response to cancer therapies where it can function as a survival mechanism that limits drug efficacy. These findings have inspired significant interest in applying anti-autophagy therapies as an entirely new approach to cancer treatment. It is now apparent that aberrant control of autophagy is among the key hallmarks of cancer. While much needs to be learned about the regulation and context-dependent biological functions of autophagy, it seems clear that modulation of this process will be an attractive avenue for future cancer therapeutic approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The process and regulation of autophagy. The stages of autophagy (initiation, elongation, closure, maturation, and degradation) are depicted. Cargo is sequestered in a double-membrane vesicle that eventually forms the autophagosome. This fuses to the lysosome (autolysosome), where the cargo is degraded by lysosomal enzymes and degradation products are recycled back into the cytosol by lysosomal permeases. mTOR is a key regulator of autophagy in response to changes in nutrient availability. During nutrient-replete conditions, mTOR is activated and autophagy is inhibited through repression of ULK1/2 (the mammalian homologs of ATG1). Upon nutrient depletion, ULK1/2 is activated and can promote autophagy initiation. ULK is also activated in states of low energy (increased AMP/ATP ratio) by phosphorylation by AMPK as well as repression of mTORC1. Also critical to autophagy initiation is the production of phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) by the class III PI3K Vps34, which is in a complex with ATG6/Beclin1 and p150 (Vps15). This complex is an additional level of regulation and, depending on the particular proteins bound, can activate or repress Vps34 activity. The ATG5–ATG12 complex as well as LC3 conjugated to PE, known as LC3-II, act downstream from Vps34 and ULK1/2 and, along with other proteins, have roles in autophagosome membrane elongation. LC3 acts downstream from the ATG5–ATG12 system and is present on the outer and inner surfaces of the autophagosome (depicted as a green oval). LC3 is a commonly used marker to monitor autophagosomes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proposed model of the role of autophagy in cancer development and progression. In normal tissue, autophagy performs homeostatic functions such as organelle and protein quality control. If autophagy is suppressed in tissues, normal homeostasis is disrupted. Consequences of this include increased inflammation, genomic instability, and aneuploidy. Together, these changes can promote tumor initiation and lead to early tumorigeneisis (the schematic depicts an early lesion with increased nuclear atypia and loss of cell polarity, but an intact basement membrane in tan). However, if autophagy continues to be suppressed, then tumor progression will not proceed. Alternatively, if autophagy is activated at this stage, cells can keep up with their metabolic demand as well as regulate oxidative stress. This allows progression to more advanced malignancy (tumor breaks through the basement membrane) as well as continued tumor growth. Genomic instability is depicted as a recurrence plot from array comparative genomic hybridization of a pancreatic cancer cell line showing multiple high-amplitude genomic changes. Aneuploidy is shown by a spectral karyotype of a tumor cell line demonstrating aneuplody and chromosomal rearrangements.

Similar articles

  • Autophagy and cancer cell metabolism.
    Lozy F, Karantza V. Lozy F, et al. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012 Jun;23(4):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Jan 18. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012. PMID: 22281437 Free PMC article. Review.
  • The multifaceted role of autophagy in tumor evasion from immune surveillance.
    Janji B, Viry E, Moussay E, Paggetti J, Arakelian T, Mgrditchian T, Messai Y, Noman MZ, Van Moer K, Hasmim M, Mami-Chouaib F, Berchem G, Chouaib S. Janji B, et al. Onco_target. 2016 Apr 5;7(14):17591-607. doi: 10.18632/onco_target.7540. Onco_target. 2016. PMID: 26910842 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Autophagy: an emerging _target for cancer therapy.
    Høyer-Hansen M, Jäättelä M. Høyer-Hansen M, et al. Autophagy. 2008 Jul;4(5):574-80. doi: 10.4161/auto.5921. Epub 2008 Mar 17. Autophagy. 2008. PMID: 18362515 Review.
  • Autophagy in malignant transformation and cancer progression.
    Galluzzi L, Pietrocola F, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Amaravadi RK, Baehrecke EH, Cecconi F, Codogno P, Debnath J, Gewirtz DA, Karantza V, Kimmelman A, Kumar S, Levine B, Maiuri MC, Martin SJ, Penninger J, Piacentini M, Rubinsztein DC, Simon HU, Simonsen A, Thorburn AM, Velasco G, Ryan KM, Kroemer G. Galluzzi L, et al. EMBO J. 2015 Apr 1;34(7):856-80. doi: 10.15252/embj.201490784. Epub 2015 Feb 23. EMBO J. 2015. PMID: 25712477 Free PMC article. Review.
  • The Evolving, Multifaceted Roles of Autophagy in Cancer.
    Liu J, Debnath J. Liu J, et al. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;130:1-53. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Adv Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27037750 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Amaravadi RK, Yu D, Lum JJ, Bui T, Christophorou MA, Evan GI, Thomas-Tikhonenko A, Thompson CB 2007. Autophagy inhibition enhances therapy-induced apoptosis in a Myc-induced model of lymphoma. J Clin Invest 117: 326–336 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amaravadi RK, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Yin XM, Weiss WA, Takebe N, Timmer W, DiPaola RS, Lotze MT, White E 2011. Principles and current strategies for _targeting autophagy for cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res 17: 654–666 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apel A, Herr I, Schwarz H, Rodemann HP, Mayer A 2008. Blocked autophagy sensitizes resistant carcinoma cells to radiation therapy. Cancer Res 68: 1485–1494 - PubMed
    1. Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Tesniere A, Criollo A, Ortiz C, Lidereau R, Mariette C, Chaput N, Mira JP, Delaloge S, et al. 2007. The interaction between HMGB1 and TLR4 dictates the outcome of anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Immunol Rev 220: 47–59 - PubMed
    1. Arias E, Cuervo AM 2011. Chaperone-mediated autophagy in protein quality control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23: 184–189 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
twitter 2