Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial
- PMID: 22351696
- PMCID: PMC3743660
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2956
Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial
Abstract
Purpose: Recent studies suggest that intrinsic breast cancer subtypes may differ in their responsiveness to specific chemotherapy regimens. We examined this hypothesis on NCIC.CTG MA.5, a clinical trial randomizing premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil) versus CEF (cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil) chemotherapy.
Experimental design: Intrinsic subtype was determined for 476 tumors using the quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR PAM50 gene expression test. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and basal-like subtypes were correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing. Multivariable Cox regression analyses determined significance of interaction between treatment and intrinsic subtypes.
Results: Intrinsic subtypes were associated with RFS (P = 0.0005) and OS (P < 0.0001) on the combined cohort. The HER2-E showed the greatest benefit from CEF versus CMF, with absolute 5-year RFS and OS differences exceeding 20%, whereas there was a less than 2% difference for non-HER2-E tumors (interaction test P = 0.03 for RFS and 0.03 for OS). Within clinically defined Her2(+) tumors, 79% (72 of 91) were classified as the HER2-E subtype by gene expression and this subset was strongly associated with better response to CEF versus CMF (62% vs. 22%, P = 0.0006). There was no significant difference in benefit between CEF and CMF in basal-like tumors [n = 94; HR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-2.1 for RFS and HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.5 for OS].
Conclusion: HER2-E strongly predicted anthracycline sensitivity. The chemotherapy-sensitive basal-like tumors showed no added benefit for CEF over CMF, suggesting that nonanthracycline regimens may be adequate in this subtype although further investigation is required.
©2012 AACR.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Topoisomerase II alpha protein and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF compared to CMF in the NCIC CTG randomized MA.5 adjuvant trial.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul;128(2):401-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1511-5. Epub 2011 Apr 26. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011. PMID: 21519837 Clinical Trial.
-
TIMP-1 in combination with HER2 and TOP2A for prediction of benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in high-risk breast cancer patients.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;132(1):225-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1896-1. Epub 2011 Dec 9. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012. PMID: 22160637 Clinical Trial.
-
Chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) duplication as a predictor of anthracycline response: evidence from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) MA.5 Trial.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jan;131(2):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1840-4. Epub 2011 Nov 1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012. PMID: 22042366 Clinical Trial.
-
Adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.Dan Med J. 2016 May;63(5):B5222. Dan Med J. 2016. PMID: 27127018 Review.
-
Selection of adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of node-positive breast cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2005 Nov;6(11):886-98. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70424-1. Lancet Oncol. 2005. PMID: 16257797 Review.
Cited by
-
Editorial: How Reproductive History Influences Our Breast Cancer Risk.Front Oncol. 2017 Dec 4;7:289. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00289. eCollection 2017. Front Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29376022 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of the Survival Benefit of Different Chemotherapy Regimens in Patients with T1-2N0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.J Breast Cancer. 2015 Sep;18(3):271-8. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.3.271. Epub 2015 Sep 24. J Breast Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26472978 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic Testing Enhances the Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 22;24(23):16607. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316607. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38068930 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Re-interpretation of PAM50 gene expression as quantitative tumor dimensions shows utility for clinical trials: application to prognosis and response to paclitaxel in breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 May;175(1):129-139. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05097-5. Epub 2019 Jan 23. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019. PMID: 30673970 Free PMC article.
-
Gene signatures in breast cancer: current and future uses.Transl Oncol. 2012 Dec;5(6):398-403. doi: 10.1593/tlo.12244. Epub 2012 Dec 1. Transl Oncol. 2012. PMID: 23323153 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, Ibrahim N, Cristofanilli M, Anderson K, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:5678–85. - PubMed
-
- Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34. - PubMed
-
- Conforti R, Boulet T, Tomasic G, Taranchon E, Arriagada R, Spielmann M, et al. Breast cancer molecular subclassification and estrogen receptor expression to predict efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines-based chemotherapy: a biomarker study from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1477–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous