The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes
- PMID: 23413806
- PMCID: PMC3748788
- DOI: 10.1111/dme.12159
The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes
Abstract
C-peptide is produced in equal amounts to insulin and is the best measure of endogenous insulin secretion in patients with diabetes. Measurement of insulin secretion using C-peptide can be helpful in clinical practice: differences in insulin secretion are fundamental to the different treatment requirements of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. This article reviews the use of C-peptide measurement in the clinical management of patients with diabetes, including the interpretation and choice of C-peptide test and its use to assist diabetes classification and choice of treatment. We provide recommendations for where C-peptide should be used, choice of test and interpretation of results. With the rising incidence of Type 2 diabetes in younger patients, the discovery of monogenic diabetes and development of new therapies aimed at preserving insulin secretion, the direct measurement of insulin secretion may be increasingly important. Advances in assays have made C-peptide measurement both more reliable and inexpensive. In addition, recent work has demonstrated that C-peptide is more stable in blood than previously suggested or can be reliably measured on a spot urine sample (urine C-peptide:creatinine ratio), facilitating measurement in routine clinical practice. The key current clinical role of C-peptide is to assist classification and management of insulin-treated patients. Utility is greatest after 3-5 years from diagnosis when persistence of substantial insulin secretion suggests Type 2 or monogenic diabetes. Absent C-peptide at any time confirms absolute insulin requirement and the appropriateness of Type 1 diabetes management strategies regardless of apparent aetiology.
© 2013 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2013 Diabetes UK.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in diabetology].Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2015;20(2):63-8. doi: 10.18544/PEDM-20.02.0004. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2015. PMID: 26615015 Review. Polish.
-
Urine C-peptide creatinine ratio is an alternative to stimulated serum C-peptide measurement in late-onset, insulin-treated diabetes.Diabet Med. 2011 Sep;28(9):1034-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03272.x. Diabet Med. 2011. PMID: 21843301
-
[The role of insulin secretion and insulin resistance in the clinical course of newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus in children].Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2005 Apr-Jun;9(2):223-34. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2005. PMID: 16085963 Polish.
-
Assessment of residual insulin secretion in diabetic patients using the intravenous glucagon stimulatory test: methodological aspects and clinical applications.Diabetes Metab. 1996 Dec;22(6):397-406. Diabetes Metab. 1996. PMID: 8985647 Review.
-
C-peptide measurement: methods and clinical utility.Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1984;19(4):297-352. doi: 10.3109/10408368409165766. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1984. PMID: 6373142 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the Hematological and Serum Biochemistry Parameters in the Pre-Symptomatic and Symptomatic Stages of ALS Disease to Support Early Diagnosis and Prognosis.Cells. 2022 Nov 11;11(22):3569. doi: 10.3390/cells11223569. Cells. 2022. PMID: 36428998 Free PMC article.
-
Personalized medicine in diabetes mellitus: current opportunities and future prospects.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Jun;1346(1):45-56. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12757. Epub 2015 Apr 23. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015. PMID: 25907167 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of C-peptide Alone or in Combination with Nicotinamide on Insulin Levels from Pancreatic Islets in Mouse.Malays J Med Sci. 2016 Jan;23(1):15-21. Malays J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27540321 Free PMC article.
-
Histological validation of a type 1 diabetes clinical diagnostic model for classification of diabetes.Diabet Med. 2020 Dec;37(12):2160-2168. doi: 10.1111/dme.14361. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Diabet Med. 2020. PMID: 32634859 Free PMC article.
-
Atypical Diabetes: What Have We Learned and What Does the Future Hold?Diabetes Care. 2024 May 1;47(5):770-781. doi: 10.2337/dci23-0038. Diabetes Care. 2024. PMID: 38329838 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, Heller SR, Montori VM, Seaquist ER, et al. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:709–728. - PubMed
-
- Clark PM. Assays for insulin, proinsulin(s) and C-peptide. Ann Clin Biochem. 1999;36:541–564. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical