Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are superior to European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria at 1 month follow-up for predicting long-term survival in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer
- PMID: 23562641
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.01.499
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are superior to European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria at 1 month follow-up for predicting long-term survival in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether response to transarterial chemoembolization can predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) and if either European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria or Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are more accurate for this purpose.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent LT after transarterial chemoembolization between January 2005 and June 2011 was performed. Follow-up imaging with multiphasic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed 1 month after transarterial chemoembolization and every 3 months thereafter until LT. Treatment response was evaluated at each imaging time point using RECIST criteria and EASL criteria. The relationship between survival and objective response (OR), time to response (TTR), time to progression (TTP), and time interval between transarterial chemoembolization and LT was assessed.
Results: A median of one transarterial chemoembolization procedure was performed before LT in 58 patients (52 men, 6 women; mean age, 57 y). OR was shown by 28 (48%) patients and 51 (88%) patients at 1 month by EASL criteria and RECIST criteria, respectively. OR at 1-month follow-up using RECIST criteria was associated with increased survival compared with patients with no response (NR) (P = .03). Using RECIST criteria, 5-year survival in the OR group was 66.7% versus 0% in the NR group (P = .015). There was no significant difference in survival in patients who showed OR at 1 month using EASL criteria. There was poor agreement between RECIST and EASL response assessments (κ = 0.23). There was no significant association between survival and TTR, TTP, or time interval between transarterial chemoembolization and LT.
Conclusions: Patients with objective response to transarterial chemoembolization at 1 month using RECIST criteria showed improved survival over nonresponders. RECIST criteria demonstrated better accuracy compared with EASL criteria for predicting survival in patients after LT who had transarterial chemoembolization as a "bridge."
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
EASL- and mRECIST-evaluated responses to combination therapy of sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolization predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Mar 15;20(6):1623-31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1716. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Clin Cancer Res. 2014. PMID: 24493832
-
Comparison of the methods for tumor response assessment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.J Hepatol. 2013 Jun;58(6):1181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.01.039. Epub 2013 Feb 8. J Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23395691
-
Which response criteria best help predict survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following chemoembolization? A validation study of old and new models.Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):708-18. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110282. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Radiology. 2012. PMID: 22187634
-
Locoregional radiological treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma; Which, when and how?Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Feb;38(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 2. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012. PMID: 21726960 Review.
-
Cost effectiveness of radioembolization compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1075-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 24. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24861664 Review.
Cited by
-
A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.BME Front. 2022;2022:9758652. doi: 10.34133/2022/9758652. Epub 2022 May 2. BME Front. 2022. PMID: 35957844 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Relevance of Objective Response According to EASL Criteria and mRECIST Criteria in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Loco-Regional Therapies: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 31;10(7):e0133488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133488. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26230853 Free PMC article.
-
Management of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: how do we decide among the various liver-directed treatments?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Apr;6(2):105-116. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.16. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28503558 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Computed tomography imaging assessment of postexternal beam radiation changes of the liver.Future Oncol. 2016 Dec;12(23):2729-2739. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0165. Epub 2016 Aug 31. Future Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27576360 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Expression of cluster of differentiation 151 prior to and following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and its association with clinicopathological characteristics.Oncol Lett. 2018 Jan;15(1):1133-1142. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7371. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Oncol Lett. 2018. PMID: 29391901 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous