Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;36(10):3247-53.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-1040. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Association of glycation gap with mortality and vascular complications in diabetes

Affiliations

Association of glycation gap with mortality and vascular complications in diabetes

Ananth U Nayak et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The "glycation gap" (G-gap), an essentially unproven concept, is an empiric measure of disagreement between HbA1c and fructosamine, the two indirect estimates of glycemic control. Its association with demographic features and key clinical outcomes in individuals with diabetes is uncertain.

Research design and methods: The G-gap was calculated as the difference between measured HbA1c and a fructosamine-derived standardized predicted HbA1c in 3,182 individuals with diabetes. The G-gap's associations with demographics and clinical outcomes (retinopathy, nephropathy, macrovascular disease, and mortality) were determined.

Results: Demographics varied significantly with G-gap for age, sex, ethnic status, smoking status, type and duration of diabetes, insulin use, and obesity. A positive G-gap was associated with retinopathy (odds ratio 1.24 [95% CI 1.01-1.52], P=0.039), nephropathy (1.55 [1.23-1.95], P<0.001), and, in a subset, macrovascular disease (1.91 [1.18-3.09], P=0.008). In Cox regression analysis, the G-gap had a "U"-shaped quadratic relationship with mortality, with both negative G-gap (1.96 [1.50-2.55], P<0.001) and positive G-gap (2.02 [1.57-2.60], P<0.001) being associated with a significantly higher mortality.

Conclusions: We confirm published associations of G-gap with retinopathy and nephropathy. We newly demonstrate a relationship with macrovascular and mortality outcomes and potential links to distinct subpopulations of diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The prevalence of negative and positive G-gap status by HbA1c quintile (χ2 = 505.8, P < 0.001). The HbA1c (mean [range]) for the quintiles of HbA1c: 1) 6.4% (3.8–7.0), 2) 7.5% (7.1–7.8), 3) 8.3% (7.9–8.6), 4) 9.2% (8.7–9.7), and 5) 11.3% (9.8–19.0).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cox regression analysis for cumulative survival from time of first testing of the whole cohort categorized according to G-gap status (for positive G-gap, n = 651; neutral G-gap, n = 1,945; and negative G-gap, n = 586).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nayak AU, Holland MR, Macdonald DR, Nevill A, Singh BM. Evidence for consistency of the glycation gap in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1712–1716 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen RM, Holmes YR, Chenier TC, Joiner CH. Discordance between HbA1c and fructosamine: evidence for a glycosylation gap and its relation to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Care 2003;26:163–167 - PubMed
    1. Hempe JM, Gomez R, McCarter RJ, Jr, Chalew SA. High and low hemoglobin glycation phenotypes in type 1 diabetes: a challenge for interpretation of glycemic control. J Diabetes Complications 2002;16:313–320 - PubMed
    1. Hudson PR, Child DF, Jones H, Williams CP. Differences in rates of glycation (glycation index) may significantly affect individual HbA1c results in type 1 diabetes. Ann Clin Biochem 1999;36:451–459 - PubMed
    1. Gould BJ, Davie SJ, Yudkin JS. Investigation of the mechanism underlying the variability of glycated haemoglobin in non-diabetic subjects not related to glycaemia. Clin Chim Acta 1997;260:49–64 - PubMed

Publication types

  NODES
Association 6
chat 1
twitter 2