Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:463073.
doi: 10.1155/2013/463073. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: a four-year clinical and radiological study

Affiliations

Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: a four-year clinical and radiological study

Andrea Enrico Borgonovo et al. Int J Dent. 2013.

Abstract

Objectives. The aim was to evaluate survival and success rates, soft tissue health, and radiographic marginal bone loss (MBL) of zirconia implants placed in the esthetic and posterior areas of the jaws and in association with multiple or single implant restorations after at least 6 months of definitive restoration. Material and Methods. 35 one-piece zirconium implants were utilized for single or partially edentulous ridges rehabilitation. All implants received immediate temporary restorations and six months after surgery were definitively restored. Every 6 months after implant placement, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed. For each radiograph, the measurements of MBL were calculated. Results. The results showed that the mean MBL at 48-month followup was 1.631 mm. The mean MBL during the first year of loading was not more significant for implants placed in the first molar regions than for those positioned in other areas. Moreover, no differences in marginal bone level changes were revealed for multiple and single implants, whereas MBL in the first year was observed to be slightly greater for implants placed in the maxilla than for those placed in the mandible. Conclusion. Zirconia showed a good marginal bone preservation that could be correlated with one-piece morphology and characteristics of zirconia implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Implant characteristics.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized periapical radiographs were obtained using the Rinn alignment system with customized silicone bite.
Figure 3
Figure 3
X-ray picture 12 months after surgery. The blue lines indicate the implant length; the red lines indicate the periimplant bone levels.
Figure 4
Figure 4
X-ray picture 24 months after surgery.
Figure 5
Figure 5
X-ray picture 48 months after surgery. No differences in marginal bone level changes can be observed from 12 to 48 months after surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1969;3(2):81–100. - PubMed
    1. Leben M Goiato JD, Gennari-Filho H, Assun OW, Dos Santos D. Esthetics in implant-supported prostheses—a literature review. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2012;38(6):718–722. - PubMed
    1. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Da Silva JD, Weber HP, Park SE. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part II. preferred implant neck color to improve soft tissue esthetics. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2007;18(5):575–580. - PubMed
    1. Bengazi F, Wennström JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants: a 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1996;7(2):303–310. - PubMed
    1. Lalor PA, Revell PA, Gray AB, Wright S, Railton GT, Freeman MAR. Sensitivity to titanium. A cause of implant failure? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B. 1991;73(1):25–28. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
Association 1
twitter 2