Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):914-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

Laparoscopic gastric plication versus mini-gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized clinical trial

Sattar Darabi  1 , Mohammad Talebpour, Atefeh Zeinoddini, Reza Heidari
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Laparoscopic gastric plication versus mini-gastric bypass surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity: a randomized clinical trial

Sattar Darabi et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) is emerging as a safe and effective bariatric procedure. However, there are no reports on the comparison between the efficacy and complications of LGP and laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB), which is still an investigational bariatric procedure. The objective of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of LGP and LMGB in the treatment of morbid obesity in a one-year follow-up study.

Methods: Forty patients met the National Institutes of Health criteria and were randomly assigned to receive either LGP (n = 20) or LMGB (n = 20) by a block randomization method. Early and late complications, body mass index (BMI), excess weight loss, and obesity-related co-morbidities were determined at the 1-year follow-up.

Results: Operative time and mean length of hospitalization were shorter in the LGP group (71.0 minutes versus 125.0 minutes, P<.001, and 1.6 days versus 5.2 days; P<.001, respectively). The mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months follow-up was 66.9% in the LMGB group and 60.8% in the LGP group (P = .34). Improvement was observed in all co-morbidities in both groups, with the exception of hyperlipidemia, which remained unresolved in 4 patients. Lower incidence of iron deficiency occurred in the LGP group (P = .035). Rehospitalization and reoperation were not required in any cases. Considering the cost of instruments used in the LMGB procedure and operative time, LGP saved approximately $2,500 per case compared with LMGB.

Conclusion: Both LGP and LMGB are effective weight loss procedures. LGP proved to be a simpler and less costly procedure compared with LMGB with a lower risk of iron deficiency during a 1-year follow-up study.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Gastric plication; Laparoscopy; Mini-gastric bypass; Morbid obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
twitter 2