Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests
- PMID: 24934213
- PMCID: PMC4047763
- DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0033-1
Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the bond strength of different orthodontic bracket materials (ceramic, stainless steel, and titanium) as well as stresses developed in bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element (FE) analysis.
Methods: One hundred and thirty-five extracted human caries-free upper central incisors were divided into three groups (n = 45/group) according to the type of orthodontic bracket materials (stainless steel, ceramic, and titanium). Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 15/group) according to the bond strength test loading mode (shear short side, shear long side, and tensile). After debonding, the fractured specimen was examined, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined. FE analysis models analyzed the stress distribution within the cement and enamel. Bond strengths were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test, and the ARI scores were analyzed using chi-square (χ2) test.
Results: Shear loading at the short side of the bracket resulted in the highest bond strength and lowest maximum principal stress both on cement and enamel compared with the other loading modes (P < 0.05). Ceramic brackets presented with higher bond strength and lower maximum principal stress than metallic brackets (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference for ARI scores between the type of brackets (χ2 = 64.852, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the manner of loading orthodontic brackets and the selection of orthodontic bracket materials affect the bond strength and stresses developed both on cement and enamel.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system.Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):608-12. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq112. Epub 2010 Dec 3. Eur J Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21131391
-
Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.Gen Dent. 2012 Jan-Feb;60(1):51-5. Gen Dent. 2012. PMID: 22313980
-
The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets.Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):232-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq193. Epub 2011 Jan 24. Eur J Orthod. 2012. PMID: 21262931 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded stainless steel brackets with three different enamel surface conditioning methods.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:25. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369627. eCollection 2023. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023. PMID: 36960018 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shear bond strength after using sealant before bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04165-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34981251 Review.
Cited by
-
Displacement and force distribution of splinted and tilted mandibular anterior teeth under occlusal loads: an in silico 3D finite element analysis.Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0129-x. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Prog Orthod. 2016. PMID: 27245235 Free PMC article.
-
An In-Vitro Analysis of the Surface Treatment of Orthodontic Bracket Bases With Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Its Effect on Shear Bond Strength.Cureus. 2023 Aug 30;15(8):e44404. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44404. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37791150 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of orthodontic bracket base shapes on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index: An in vitro study.J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e848-e854. doi: 10.4317/jced.53869. eCollection 2017 Jul. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017. PMID: 28828149 Free PMC article.
-
Tridimensional finite element analysis of teeth movement induced by different headgear forces.Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0130-4. Epub 2016 Jun 6. Prog Orthod. 2016. PMID: 27264500 Free PMC article.
-
Safe Debonding of Fixed Appliances: A Comparison of Traditional Techniques and LODI Devices on Different Bracket Types in Terms of Enamel Cracks, Site of Bond Failure, and Bracket Reusability.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910267. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639565 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lavernhe P, Estivalèzes E, Lachaud F, Lodter C, Piquet R. Orthodontic bonding: finite element for standardized evaluations. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2010;15:21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.008. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources