Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Apr 16;15(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0033-1.

Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests

Shaymaa E Elsaka et al. Prog Orthod. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the bond strength of different orthodontic bracket materials (ceramic, stainless steel, and titanium) as well as stresses developed in bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element (FE) analysis.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-five extracted human caries-free upper central incisors were divided into three groups (n = 45/group) according to the type of orthodontic bracket materials (stainless steel, ceramic, and titanium). Each group was further subdivided into three subgroups (n = 15/group) according to the bond strength test loading mode (shear short side, shear long side, and tensile). After debonding, the fractured specimen was examined, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined. FE analysis models analyzed the stress distribution within the cement and enamel. Bond strengths were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test, and the ARI scores were analyzed using chi-square (χ2) test.

Results: Shear loading at the short side of the bracket resulted in the highest bond strength and lowest maximum principal stress both on cement and enamel compared with the other loading modes (P < 0.05). Ceramic brackets presented with higher bond strength and lower maximum principal stress than metallic brackets (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference for ARI scores between the type of brackets (χ2 = 64.852, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the manner of loading orthodontic brackets and the selection of orthodontic bracket materials affect the bond strength and stresses developed both on cement and enamel.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative three-dimensional finite element models of the ceramic bracket-cement-enamel system with different loading modes. (a) Shear short side, (b) shear long side, and (c) tensile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative finite element meshes of the ceramic bracket-cement-enamel system.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Maximum principal stress distribution of shear short side bracket loading mode on enamel (left) and cement (right). (a,b) Stainless steel, (c,d) ceramic, and (e,f) titanium.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Maximum principal stress distribution of shear long side bracket loading mode on enamel (left) and cement (right). (a,b) Stainless steel, (c,d) ceramic, and (e,f) titanium.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Maximum principal stress distribution of tensile bracket loading mode on enamel (left) and cement (right). (a,b) Stainless steel, (c,d) ceramic, and (e,f) titanium.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lavernhe P, Estivalèzes E, Lachaud F, Lodter C, Piquet R. Orthodontic bonding: finite element for standardized evaluations. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2010;15:21–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.008. - DOI
    1. Gioka C, Bourauel C, Zinelis S, Eliades T, Silikas N, Eliades G. Titanium orthodontic brackets: structure, composition, hardness and ionic release. Dent Mater. 2004;15:693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kusy RP, O'Grady PW. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: part II–the active configuration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;15:675–84. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.97818. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Theodorakopoulou LP, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Lacefield WJ. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;15:329–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winchester LJ. Bond strengths of five different ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 1991;15:293–305. doi: 10.1093/ejo/13.4.293. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
twitter 2