The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men
- PMID: 25168616
- PMCID: PMC4407822
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.011
The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men
Abstract
Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has limited accuracy for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa).
Objective: To assess the value added by percentage of free to total PSA (%fPSA), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), and a kallikrein panel (4k-panel) to the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) multivariable prediction models: risk calculator (RC) 4, including transrectal ultrasound, and RC 4 plus digital rectal examination (4+DRE) for prescreened men.
Design, setting, and participants: Participants were invited for rescreening between October 2007 and February 2009 within the Dutch part of the ERSPC study. Biopsies were taken in men with a PSA level ≥3.0 ng/ml or a PCA3 score ≥10. Additional analyses of the 4k-panel were done on serum samples.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Outcome was defined as PCa detectable by sextant biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analyses were performed to compare the predictive capabilities of %fPSA, PCA3, 4k-panel, the ERSPC RCs, and their combinations in logistic regression models.
Results and limitations: PCa was detected in 119 of 708 men. The %fPSA did not perform better univariately or added to the RCs compared with the RCs alone. In 202 men with an elevated PSA, the 4k-panel discriminated better than PCA3 when modelled univariately (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.78 vs. 0.62; p=0.01). The multivariable models with PCA3 or the 4k-panel were equivalent (AUC: 0.80 for RC 4+DRE). In the total population, PCA3 discriminated better than the 4k-panel (univariate AUC: 0.63 vs. 0.56; p=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the multivariable model with PCA3 (AUC: 0.73) versus the model with the 4k-panel (AUC: 0.71; p=0.18). The multivariable model with PCA3 performed better than the reference model (0.73 vs. 0.70; p=0.02). Decision curves confirmed these patterns, although numbers were small.
Conclusions: Both PCA3 and, to a lesser extent, a 4k-panel have added value to the DRE-based ERSPC RC in detecting PCa in prescreened men.
Patient summary: We studied the added value of novel biomarkers to previously developed risk prediction models for prostate cancer. We found that inclusion of these biomarkers resulted in an increase in predictive ability.
Keywords: Kallikrein panel (4k-panel); Percentage of free to total PSA; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3); Prostate cancer risk calculator; Validation.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Figures
Comment in
-
Re: The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):127. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.074. Epub 2014 Oct 22. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25523657 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Nov 15. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22104592
-
Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.039. Epub 2015 May 16. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 25985884 Free PMC article.
-
Re: The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):127. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.074. Epub 2014 Oct 22. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25523657 No abstract available.
-
Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of PSA screening? A meta-analysis.Ann Oncol. 2015 May;26(5):848-864. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu525. Epub 2014 Nov 17. Ann Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25403590 Review.
-
Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):12-19. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.59. Epub 2016 Dec 6. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017. PMID: 27922627 Review.
Cited by
-
Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 ng/ml and Above.J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):607-613. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.086. Epub 2016 Sep 28. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27693450 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction Medicine: Biomarkers, Risk Calculators and Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Risk Stratification Tools in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 2;20(7):1637. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071637. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30986955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of a short RNA within Prostate Cancer Gene 3 in the predictive role for future cancer using non-malignant prostate biopsies.PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0175070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175070. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28380027 Free PMC article.
-
Racial Variation in the Utility of Urinary Biomarkers PCA3 and T2ERG in a Large Multicenter Study.J Urol. 2017 Jul;198(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.058. Epub 2017 Jan 20. J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28115190 Free PMC article.
-
An Automated Micro-Total Immunoassay System for Measuring Cancer-Associated α2,3-linked Sialyl N-Glycan-Carrying Prostate-Specific Antigen May Improve the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 22;18(2):470. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020470. Int J Mol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28241428 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol. 2011;59:61–71. - PubMed
-
- Draisma G, Boer R, Otto SJ, van der Cruijsen IW, et al. Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening: estimates from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:868–78. - PubMed
-
- Steyerberg EW, Roobol MJ, Kattan MW, van der Kwast TH, de Koning HJ, Schroder FH. Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram. J Urol. 2007;177:107–12. discussion 112. - PubMed
-
- Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al. Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:529–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous