Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 1;7(4):e85-93.
eCollection 2013.

Classification of Canadian immigrants into visible minority groups using country of birth and mother tongue

Affiliations

Classification of Canadian immigrants into visible minority groups using country of birth and mother tongue

Mohammad R Rezai et al. Open Med. .

Abstract

Background: The Permanent Resident Database of Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) contains sociodemographic information on immigrants but lacks ethnic group classifications. To enhance its usability for ethnicityrelated research, we categorized immigrants in the CIC database into one of Canada's official visible minority groups or a white category using their country of birth and mother tongue.

Methods: Using public data sources, we classified each of 267 country names and 245 mother tongues in the CIC data into 1 of 10 visible minority groups (South Asian, Chinese, black, Latin American, Filipino, West Asian, Arab, Southeast Asian, Korean, and Japanese) or a white group. We then used country of birth alone (method A) or country of birth plus mother tongue (method B) to classify 2.5 million people in the CIC database who immigrated to Ontario between 1985 and 2010 and who had a valid encrypted health card number. We validated the ethnic categorizations using linked selfreported ethnicity data for 6499 people who responded to the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS).

Results: Among immigrants listed in the CIC database, the 4 most frequent visible minority groups as classified by method B were South Asian (n = 582 812), Chinese (n = 400 771), black (n = 254 189), and Latin American (n = 179 118). Methods A and B agreed in 94% of the categorizations (kappa coefficient 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.94). Both methods A and B agreed with self-reported CCHS ethnicity in 86% of all categorizations (for both comparisons, kappa coefficient 0.83, 95% CI 0.82-0.84). Both methods A and B had high sensitivity and specificity for most visible minority groups when validated using self-reported ethnicity from the CCHS (e.g., with method B, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.85 and 0.97 for South Asians, 0.93 and 0.99 for Chinese, and 0.90 and 0.97 for blacks).

Interpretation: The use of country of birth and mother tongue is a validated and practical method for classifying immigrants to Canada into ethnic categories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
World distribution of major ethnic groups associated with countries of birth of the immigrants in Citizenship and Immigration Canada's Permanent Resident Database for Ontario (1985–2010). The national boundaries shown on the map are not an expression of the authors' views on the legal status of territories or the definition of the boundaries.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Visible minority population and population group reference guide, 2006 Census. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2008. Catalogue no. 97-562-GWE2006003. Available from: www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/ref/rp-guides/ethnic-ethniqu... (accessed 2012 Oct 17).
    1. Ethnic diversity and immigration. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2010. Available from: www41.statcan.gc.ca/2009/30000/cybac30000_000-eng.htm (accessed 2012 Dec 21).
    1. Table 051-0011: International migrants, by age group and sex, Canada, provinces, and territories, annual (persons) Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2012. Available from: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-214-x/2009000/related-connexes-eng.htm (accessed 2012 Oct 5).
    1. Lin SS, Kelsey JL. Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):187–202. - PubMed
    1. Mays VM, Ponce NA, Washington DL, Cochran SD. Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:83–110. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
admin 2
COMMUNITY 2
INTERN 1
Project 2
twitter 2