Radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 25889181
- PMCID: PMC4355988
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0516-7
Radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) are treatment methods for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not suitable for surgery. Although some reports indicate that RFA is better than PEI, results from previous reviews and analyses are inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to more thoroughly evaluate the effects of these treatments in patients with HCC.
Methods: A literature search was conducted using the Excerpta Medica dataBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the American Society of Clinical Oncology database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, the Wanfang database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Chongqing VIP database without language limitations. The primary outcome evaluated was overall survival, and secondary outcomes included complete response and local recurrence. Comparisons were made between Asian and European studies.
Results: Total pooled and subgroup analyses of Asian studies that included selection biases revealed that RFA is superior to PEI with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio (HR), 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37 to 0.80; P < 0.01) and complete response (relative risk (RR), 1.10; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.18; P < 0.01). However, no significant difference was observed between RFA and PEI in the European studies. In Asian studies, RFA was associated with a lower local recurrence rate than PEI at 1 year (RR, 0.44; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.95; P < 0.05) and 3 years (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.55; P < 0.01). However, local recurrence was significantly lower after only 3 years in European studies (RR, 0.50; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.78; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: RFA was only superior to PEI in Asian studies that included selection bias. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to support the idea that RFA is superior to PEI for patients with cirrhotic HCC. Additional large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials that control for selection bias are needed to fully elucidate the optimal treatment method for HCC.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection in hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC Gastroenterol. 2009 May 11;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-31. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19432967 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 19;(12):CD003046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003046.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24357457 Review.
-
Percutaneous ethanol injection or percutaneous acetic acid injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 26;1(1):CD006745. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006745.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25620061 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic evaluation of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Eur J Med Res. 2014 Aug 20;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-19-39. Eur J Med Res. 2014. Retraction in: Eur J Med Res. 2015 Mar 26;20:41. doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0131-7 PMID: 25141776 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous alcohol and acetic acid injection for hepatocelullar carcinoma: a meta-analysis.J Hepatol. 2010 Mar;52(3):380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.004. Epub 2010 Jan 17. J Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 20149473
Cited by
-
2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations.J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020 Jan-Feb;10(1):43-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 23. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 32025166 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of radiofrequency ablation versus other ablating techniques on hepatocellular carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;15(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1196-2. World J Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28693505 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Local ablative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated review.World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Nov 6;7(4):477-489. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i4.477. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016. PMID: 27867681 Free PMC article. Review.
-
2022 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for Local Ablation Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What's New?Korean J Radiol. 2023 Jan;24(1):10-14. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0555. Korean J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36606614 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Gut Liver. 2019 May 15;13(3):227-299. doi: 10.5009/gnl19024. Gut Liver. 2019. PMID: 31060120 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical