Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0125124.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125124. eCollection 2015.

Prospective memory function in late adulthood: affect at encoding and resource allocation costs

Affiliations

Prospective memory function in late adulthood: affect at encoding and resource allocation costs

Julie D Henry et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Some studies have found that prospective memory (PM) cues which are emotionally valenced influence age effects in prospective remembering, but it remains unclear whether this effect reflects the operation of processes implemented at encoding or retrieval. In addition, none of the prior ageing studies of valence on PM function have examined potential costs of engaging in different valence conditions, or resource allocation trade-offs between the PM and the ongoing task. In the present study, younger, young-old and old-old adults completed a PM task in which the valence of the cues varied systematically (positive, negative or neutral) at encoding, but was kept constant (neutral) at retrieval. The results indicated that PM accuracy did not vary as a function of affect at encoding, and that this effect did not interact with age group. There was also no main or interaction effect of valence on PM reaction time in PM cue trials, indicating that valence costs across the three encoding conditions were equivalent. Old-old adults' PM accuracy was reduced relative to both young-old and younger adults. Prospective remembering incurred dual-task costs for all three groups. Analyses of reaction time data suggested that for both young-old and old-old, these costs were greater, implying differential resource allocation cost trade-offs. However, when reaction time data were expressed as a proportional change that adjusted for the general slowing of the older adults, costs did not differ as a function of group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Prospective memory accuracy as a function of emotional valence (Fig 1a); ongoing task accuracy (Fig 1b) and reaction time (Fig 1c) as a function of ongoing task phase (PM, no PM).
Bars represent one standard error of the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Henry JD, MacLeod MS, Phillips LH, Crawford JR. A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychol Aging. 2004;19: 27–39. 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charles ST, Mather M, Carstensen LL. Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003;132: 310–324. 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reed AE, Chan L, Mikels JA. Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychol Aging. 2014;29: 1–15. 10.1037/a0035194 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altgassen M, Phillips LH, Henry JD, Rendell PG, Kliegel M. Emotional _target cues eliminate age differences in prospective memory. Q J Exp Psychol. 2010;63: 1057–1064. 10.1080/17470211003770920 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rendell PG, Phillips LH, Henry JD, Brumby-Rendell T, de la Piedad Garcia X, Altgassen M, et al. Prospective memory, emotional valence and ageing. Cogn Emot. 2011;25: 916–925. 10.1080/02699931.2010.508610 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by a Discovery Project Grant from the Australian Research Council (DP0984844). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
  NODES
Project 1
twitter 2