A Case Study of the Impact of Data-Adaptive Versus Model-Based Estimation of the Propensity Scores on Causal Inferences from Three Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators
- PMID: 27227720
- PMCID: PMC6052862
- DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0028
A Case Study of the Impact of Data-Adaptive Versus Model-Based Estimation of the Propensity Scores on Causal Inferences from Three Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators
Abstract
Objective: Consistent estimation of causal effects with inverse probability weighting estimators is known to rely on consistent estimation of propensity scores. To alleviate the bias expected from incorrect model specification for these nuisance parameters in observational studies, data-adaptive estimation and in particular an ensemble learning approach known as Super Learning has been proposed as an alternative to the common practice of estimation based on arbitrary model specification. While the theoretical arguments against the use of the latter haphazard estimation strategy are evident, the extent to which data-adaptive estimation can improve inferences in practice is not. Some practitioners may view bias concerns over arbitrary parametric assumptions as academic considerations that are inconsequential in practice. They may also be wary of data-adaptive estimation of the propensity scores for fear of greatly increasing estimation variability due to extreme weight values. With this report, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the potential practical consequences of the choice of estimation strategy for the propensity scores in real-world comparative effectiveness research.
Method: We implement secondary analyses of Electronic Health Record data from a large cohort of type 2 diabetes patients to evaluate the effects of four adaptive treatment intensification strategies for glucose control (dynamic treatment regimens) on subsequent development or progression of urinary albumin excretion. Three Inverse Probability Weighting estimators are implemented using both model-based and data-adaptive estimation strategies for the propensity scores. Their practical performances for proper confounding and selection bias adjustment are compared and evaluated against results from previous randomized experiments.
Conclusion: Results suggest both potential reduction in bias and increase in efficiency at the cost of an increase in computing time when using Super Learning to implement Inverse Probability Weighting estimators to draw causal inferences.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Super learning to hedge against incorrect inference from arbitrary parametric assumptions in marginal structural modeling.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.01.016. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23849160 Free PMC article.
-
High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):753-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.6377. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Stat Med. 2015. PMID: 25488047
-
_targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):29-57. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0038. Int J Biostat. 2014. PMID: 24516006
-
Review and comparison of treatment effect estimators using propensity and prognostic scores.Int J Biostat. 2022 Aug 9;18(2):357-380. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0005. eCollection 2022 Nov 1. Int J Biostat. 2022. PMID: 35942611 Review.
-
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3. Stat Med. 2015. PMID: 26238958 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Bisphosphonate Treatment Beyond 5 Years and Hip Fracture Risk in Older Women.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2025190. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25190. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33284336 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise During the First Trimester of Pregnancy and the Risks of Abnormal Screening and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):425-432. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1475. Epub 2020 Dec 21. Diabetes Care. 2021. PMID: 33355301 Free PMC article.
-
MULTIPLY ROBUST ESTIMATORS OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FOR SURVIVAL OUTCOMES.Scand Stat Theory Appl. 2022 Sep;49(3):1304-1328. doi: 10.1111/sjos.12561. Epub 2021 Nov 11. Scand Stat Theory Appl. 2022. PMID: 36033967 Free PMC article.
-
Practice Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Anticoagulation Use Following Sepsis Hospitalizations With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Mar;16(3):e009494. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009494. Epub 2023 Feb 28. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023. PMID: 36852680 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal P2Y12 inhibitor durations in older men and older women following an acute myocardial infarction: A nationwide cohort study using Medicare data.Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Dec;36:100339. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100339. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Am Heart J Plus. 2023. PMID: 38487715 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Robins JM. Association, causation and marginal structural models. Synthese. 1999;121:151–79.
-
- McCaffrey DF, Ridgeway G, Morral AR. Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychol Methods. 2004;9:403–25. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources