Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0155455.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155455. eCollection 2016.

GpDSR7, a Novel E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Grimmia pilifera Is Involved in Tolerance to Drought Stress in Arabidopsis

Affiliations

GpDSR7, a Novel E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in Grimmia pilifera Is Involved in Tolerance to Drought Stress in Arabidopsis

Mengmeng Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The growth and development of plants under drought stress depends mainly on the expression levels of various genes and modification of proteins. To clarify the molecular mechanism of drought-tolerance of plants, suppression subtractive hybridisation cDNA libraries were screened to identify drought-stress-responsive unigenes in Grimmia pilifera, and a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase gene, GpDSR7, was identified among the 240 responsive unigenes. GpDSR7 expression was induced by various abiotic stresses, particularly by drought. GpDSR7 displayed E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in vitro and was exclusively localised on the ER membrane in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. GpDSR7-overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed a high water content and survival ratio under drought stress. Moreover, the expression levels of some marker genes involved in drought stress were higher in the transgenic plants than in wild-type plants. These results suggest that GpDSR7, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is involved in tolerance to drought stress at the protein modification level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. General summarisation of SSH cDNA libraries in G. pilifera.
(A) Relative water contents were measured to determine the water status of dehydrated gametophytes. Arrows indicate 0.5- and 2.5-h treatments, which were selected for SSH cDNA library construction. Bars are means ± SD of five biological replicates. (B) Morphologies of G. pilifera gametophytes under fully hydrated and dehydrated conditions. Bar = 2 mm. (C) Percentage distribution of unigenes categorised into functional classes. (D) Expression patterns of several drought-responsive genes identified by SSH. Total RNA was extracted from G. pilifera at 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.50 h after drought stress treatment and analysed by qRT-PCR using gene-specific primers. Actin was used as the internal control. *Numbers in parentheses are numbers of EST fragments of the GpDSR genes in the SSH library.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Sequence analysis of GpDSR7.
(A) Schematic structure of the GpDSR7 cDNA and predicted GpDSR7 protein. Hatched bar indicates the RING (Really Interesting New Gene) motif, and dark bar indicates the C-terminal putative TM domain. (B) Comparison of the derived amino acid sequence of GpDSR7 with its homologues from other species, including rice (Os06g0677300), Musa acuminata (ABF69983.1), Arabidopsis (At5g60580), maize (NP_001148132.1), Medicago truncatula (XP_003594026.1), and Brassica rapa (ADK63404.1). Solid line denotes the RING motif, and conserved metal ligand positions are indicated by numbered cysteine (C) and histidine (H) residues. Triangles indicate the sites of mutations (C224S, C242S, and H250Y).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Expression of GpDSR7 in response to various abiotic-related stresses in G. pilifera.
Rehydrated G. pilifera gametophytes were subjected to drought, ABA, high salinity, or low-temperature stress. Expression patterns of GpDSR7 were determined by qRT-PCR. GpDSR7 expression without treatment was set as 1.0. 18S rRNA was used as the internal control.
Fig 4
Fig 4. In vitro self-ubiquitination assay of GpDSR7.
The C-terminal TM domain truncated form of GpDSR7 was defined as GpDSR7Δ. (A) GST-tagged GpDSR7Δ fusion protein was assayed for E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in the presence of E1, E2, and Ubi-Myc. Ubiquitinated proteins were detected by western blot analysis using an anti-GST antibody (left panel) and anti-Myc antibody (right panel). Triangles indicate non-ubiquitinated GST-GpDSR7Δ. (B) Purified WT GST-GpDSR7Δ and mutant proteins were used in the E3 Ub ligase enzyme assay.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Subcellular localisation of GpDSR7 in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts.
(A) Schematic of GpDSR7 and constructs used in the subcellular localisation assay. Lines indicate deleted regions. TM, transmembrane domain; RING, RING finger domain. (B) The fusion constructs GpDSR7-GFP, GpDSR7-TM-GFP and GpDSR7-ΔTM-GFP were transiently cotransformed with mCherry-labelled ER marker or cytoplasm (CT) marker into Arabidopsis mesophyll cells. All images were obtained from one optic section. Scale bars are equivalent to 10 μm.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Drought response of 35S:GpDSR7 over-expressed transgenic Arabidospsis plants.
(A) Seven-day-old seedlings were transferred to soil for a further 2 weeks of normal growth (left panel), subjected to progressive drought by withholding water for 20 days (middle panel), and then re-watered for 7 days (right panel). (B) Survival rate of plants after re-watering (n > 40). Asterisks indicate significant differences determined by Student’s t test (* 0.01 < P < 0.05). (C) Leaves of 20-day-old plants were excised and weighed at various time points after detachment. Values are means ± SD of three individual plants. (D) Two independent T3 transgenic lines #1 and #2 were subjected to RT-PCR (upper) and immunoblotting (lower) for detecting the expression of GpDSR7. We have used the wildtype (WT) and the plants tranformed with empty vector (EV) as the control.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Expression of drought-stress-responsive genes in wild-type and GpDSR7-overexpressed Arabidopsis.
Total RNA was extracted from control and drought-treated plants and the expression of several drought-responsive gene was analysed by qRT-PCR. The mean value of three technical replicates was normalised to the expression level of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Blank columns: control group; slash columns: #1 transgenic plants; black columns: #2 transgenic plants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hirayama T, Shinozaki K. Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post-genome era: past, present and future. Plant J. 2010;61(6):1041–52. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04124.x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyer JS. Plant productivity and environment. Science. 1982;218(4571):443–8. 10.1126/science.218.4571.443 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu J-K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53(4):247–73. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinocur B, Altman A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16(2):123–32. 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.001 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):221–7. 10.1093/jxb/erl164 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program, No. 2007AA02140). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
INTERN 2
Note 1
twitter 2