Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 14;90(23):10446-10458.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.01284-16. Print 2016 Dec 1.

Human Monoclonal Antibody 81.39a Effectively Neutralizes Emerging Influenza A Viruses of Group 1 and 2 Hemagglutinins

Affiliations

Human Monoclonal Antibody 81.39a Effectively Neutralizes Emerging Influenza A Viruses of Group 1 and 2 Hemagglutinins

Henju Marjuki et al. J Virol. .

Abstract

The pandemic threat posed by emerging zoonotic influenza A viruses necessitates development of antiviral agents effective against various antigenic subtypes. Human monoclonal antibody (hMAb) _targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) stalk offers a promising approach to control influenza virus infections. Here, we investigated the ability of the hMAb 81.39a to inhibit in vitro replication of human and zoonotic viruses, representing 16 HA subtypes. The majority of viruses were effectively neutralized by 81.39a at a 50% effective concentration (EC50) of <0.01 to 4.9 μg/ml. Among group 2 HA viruses tested, a single A(H7N9) virus was not neutralized at 50 μg/ml; it contained HA2-Asp19Gly, an amino acid position previously associated with resistance to neutralization by the group 2 HA-neutralizing MAb CR8020. Notably, among group 1 HA viruses, H11-H13 and H16 subtypes were not neutralized at 50 μg/ml; they shared the substitution HA2-Asp19Asn/Ala. Conversely, H9 viruses harboring HA2-Asp19Ala were fully susceptible to neutralization. Therefore, amino acid variance at HA2-Asp19 has subtype-specific adverse effects on in vitro neutralization. Mice given a single injection (15 or 45 mg/kg of body weight) at 24 or 48 h after infection with recently emerged A(H5N2), A(H5N8), A(H6N1), or A(H7N9) viruses were protected from mortality and showed drastically reduced lung viral titers. Furthermore, 81.39a protected mice infected with A(H7N9) harboring HA2-Asp19Gly, although the antiviral effect was lessened. A(H1N1)pdm09-infected ferrets receiving a single dose (25 mg/kg) had reduced viral titers and showed less lung tissue injury, despite 24- to 72-h-delayed treatment. Taken together, this study provides experimental evidence for the therapeutic potential of 81.39a against diverse influenza A viruses.

Importance: Zoonotic influenza viruses, such as A(H5N1) and A(H7N9) subtypes, have caused severe disease and deaths in humans, raising public health concerns. Development of novel anti-influenza therapeutics with a broad spectrum of activity against various subtypes is necessary to mitigate disease severity. Here, we demonstrate that the hemagglutinin (HA) stalk-_targeting human monoclonal antibody 81.39a effectively neutralized the majority of influenza A viruses tested, representing 16 HA subtypes. Furthermore, delayed treatment with 81.39a significantly suppressed virus replication in the lungs, prevented dramatic body weight loss, and increased survival rates of mice infected with A(H5Nx), A(H6N1), or A(H7N9) viruses. When tested in ferrets, delayed 81.39a treatment reduced viral titers, particularly in the lower respiratory tract, and substantially alleviated disease symptoms associated with severe A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza. Collectively, our data demonstrated the effectiveness of 81.39a against both seasonal and emerging influenza A viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Effectiveness of 81.39a treatment in mice. Viral titers in lungs (A, D, G, J, and M), change in body weight (B, E, H, K, and N), and survival (C, F, I, L, and O) of mice inoculated with 105.6 EID50 of H5N2 (A to C), 106.6 EID50 of H5N8 (D to F), 105.1 TCID50 of H6N1 (G to I), 105.2 TCID50 of A(H7N9) wild-type (J to L), or 105.2 TCID50 of A(H7N9) HA2-Asp19Gly (M to O) virus and treated at 24 hpi for A(H5N2), A(H5N8), and A(H6N1) or 48 hpi for A(H7N9) with 81.39a at the indicated dose. All data are expressed as the means ± SD. (A and B) Representative results from an experiment with 22 mice per group. (C) Representative results from an experiment with 14 mice per group. (D and E) Representative results from two independent experiments with 10 to 14 mice per group. Dotted lines in lung viral titers indicate the limit of detection (<1.6 log10). *, P < 0.05; ND, not determined.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Effectiveness of 81.39a treatment in ferrets. Viral titers in nasal washes (NW) (A), nasal turbinates (NT) (B), trachea (TR) (C), and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (D), as well as inflammatory cell counts (E) and protein concentrations (F) in BALF. Groups of four ferrets were inoculated with 106 TCID50 of H1N1pdm virus and treated with 25 mg/kg of control IgG or 81.39a at the indicated hours postinoculation. Nasal washes were collected 1 to 5 dpi, while respiratory tract tissues and BALF were harvested at 5 dpi. All data are expressed as the means ± SD. In panels B to D, each data point represents the viral titer of an individual animal. Dotted lines in lung viral titers indicate the limit of detection (<1.6 log10). *, P < 0.05.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Pulmonary histopathology lesions and antigen expression in infected ferrets. Animals were inoculated with 106 TCID50 of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus and treated with 25 mg/kg of control IgG or 25 mg/kg of 81.39a at 24, 48, or 72 hpi. Lungs were collected from each animal at day 5. Each image was derived from one sample as a representative of the respective treatment group with four ferrets per group. Viral NP stains are shown by black arrows. Images were taken with ×200 magnification. H/E, hematoxylin and eosin stain; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chang LY, Shih SR, Shao PL, Huang DT, Huang LM. 2009. Novel swine-origin influenza virus A (H1N1): the first pandemic of the 21st century. J Formos Med Assoc 108:526–532. doi:10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60369-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Vries E, Guo H, Dai M, Rottier PJ, van Kuppeveld FJ, de Haan CA. 2015. Rapid emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza subtypes from a subtype H5N1 hemagglutinin variant. Emerg Infect Dis 21:842–846. doi:10.3201/eid2105.141927. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marty FM, Man CY, van der Horst C, Francois B, Garot D, Manez R, Thamlikitkul V, Lorente JA, Alvarez-Lerma F, Brealey D, Zhao HH, Weller S, Yates PJ, Peppercorn AF. 2014. Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous zanamivir treatment in hospitalized adults with influenza: an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study. J Infect Dis 209:542–550. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006. High levels of adamantane resistance among influenza A (H3N2) viruses and interim guidelines for use of antiviral agents–United States, 2005-06 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55:44–46. - PubMed
    1. Baranovich T, Bahl J, Marathe BM, Culhane M, Stigger-Rosser E, Darnell D, Kaplan BS, Lowe JF, Webby RJ, Govorkova EA. 2015. Influenza A viruses of swine circulating in the United States during 2009-2014 are susceptible to neuraminidase inhibitors but show lineage-dependent resistance to adamantanes. Antiviral Res 117:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.02.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

  NODES
twitter 2