Integrating chemical analysis and bioanalysis to evaluate the contribution of wastewater effluent on the micropollutant burden in small streams
- PMID: 27810763
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.141
Integrating chemical analysis and bioanalysis to evaluate the contribution of wastewater effluent on the micropollutant burden in small streams
Abstract
Surface waters can contain a range of micropollutants from point sources, such as wastewater effluent, and diffuse sources, such as agriculture. Characterizing the source of micropollutants is important for reducing their burden and thus mitigating adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems. In this study, chemical analysis and bioanalysis were applied to assess the micropollutant burden during low flow conditions upstream and downstream of three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) discharging into small streams in the Swiss Plateau. The upstream sites had no input of wastewater effluent, allowing a direct comparison of the observed effects with and without the contribution of wastewater. Four hundred and five chemicals were analyzed, while the applied bioassays included activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, activation of the androgen receptor, activation of the estrogen receptor, photosystem II inhibition, acetylcholinesterase inhibition and adaptive stress responses for oxidative stress, genotoxicity and inflammation, as well as assays indicative of estrogenic activity and developmental toxicity in zebrafish embryos. Chemical analysis and bioanalysis showed higher chemical concentrations and effects for the effluent samples, with the lowest chemical concentrations and effects in most assays for the upstream sites. Mixture toxicity modeling was applied to assess the contribution of detected chemicals to the observed effect. For most bioassays, very little of the observed effects could be explained by the detected chemicals, with the exception of photosystem II inhibition, where herbicides explained the majority of the effect. This emphasizes the importance of combining bioanalysis with chemical analysis to provide a more complete picture of the micropollutant burden. While the wastewater effluents had a significant contribution to micropollutant burden downstream, both chemical analysis and bioanalysis showed a relevant contribution of diffuse sources from upstream during low flow conditions, suggesting that upgrading WWTPs will not completely reduce the micropollutant burden, but further source control measures will be required.
Keywords: Bioassays; Chemical analysis; Micropollutant; Mixture modeling; Surface water; Wastewater.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effects of treated wastewater on the ecotoxicity of small streams - Unravelling the contribution of chemicals causing effects.PLoS One. 2019 Dec 27;14(12):e0226278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226278. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31881027 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Emission Sources and Tributaries on the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Micropollutant Mixtures and Associated Effects in a Small River.Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Jul;39(7):1382-1391. doi: 10.1002/etc.4726. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020. PMID: 32347587
-
Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent.Water Res. 2016 Mar 1;90:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 10. Water Res. 2016. PMID: 26724443
-
Chemicals of emerging concern in the Great Lakes Basin: an analysis of environmental exposures.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010;207:1-93. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6406-9_1. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2010. PMID: 20652664 Review.
-
The role of mobile genetic elements in organic micropollutant degradation during biological wastewater treatment.Water Res X. 2020 Aug 29;9:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100065. eCollection 2020 Dec 1. Water Res X. 2020. PMID: 32984801 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Re-evaluation of neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (E 959) as a food additive.EFSA J. 2022 Nov 17;20(11):e07595. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7595. eCollection 2022 Nov. EFSA J. 2022. PMID: 36406883 Free PMC article.
-
Wastewater treatment efficacy evaluated with in vitro bioassays.Water Res X. 2020 Oct 1;9:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100072. eCollection 2020 Dec 1. Water Res X. 2020. PMID: 33089130 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of treated wastewater on the ecotoxicity of small streams - Unravelling the contribution of chemicals causing effects.PLoS One. 2019 Dec 27;14(12):e0226278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226278. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31881027 Free PMC article.
-
Current EU research activities on combined exposure to multiple chemicals.Environ Int. 2018 Nov;120:544-562. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Aug 28. Environ Int. 2018. PMID: 30170309 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities - combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis.Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 21;8(1):17200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35533-x. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30464315 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases