Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176472.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176472. eCollection 2017.

In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review

Tamara Hoppenbrouwers  1   2 , Anouchska S A Autar  2   3 , Andi R Sultan  4 , Tsion E Abraham  5 , Wiggert A van Cappellen  5 , Adriaan B Houtsmuller  5 , Willem J B van Wamel  4 , Heleen M M van Beusekom  3 , Johan W van Neck  1 , Moniek P M de Maat  2
Affiliations
Review

In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review

Tamara Hoppenbrouwers et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Multiple inducers of in vitro Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) formation (NETosis) have been described. Since there is much variation in study design and results, our aim was to create a systematic review of NETosis inducers and perform a standardized in vitro study of NETosis inducers important in (cardiac) wound healing.

Methods: In vitro NETosis was studied by incubating neutrophils with PMA, living and dead bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli), LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant), glucose and calcium ionophore Ionomycin using 3-hour periods of time-lapse confocal imaging.

Results: PMA is a consistent and potent inducer of NETosis. Ionomycin also consistently resulted in extrusion of DNA, albeit with a process that differs from the NETosis process induced by PMA. In our standardized experiments, living bacteria were also potent inducers of NETosis, but dead bacteria, LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant) and glucose did not induce NETosis.

Conclusion: Our systematic review confirms that there is much variation in study design and results of NETosis induction. Our experimental results confirm that under standardized conditions, PMA, living bacteria and Ionomycin all strongly induce NETosis, but real-time confocal imaging reveal different courses of events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISM chart of the systematic literature review.
Fig 2
Fig 2. NETosis induction for the different inducers.
NETosis was defined as the ratio between the number of Hoechst and PI positive cells. PMA induced NETosis when compared to unstimulated neutrophils, p<0.001 repeated measures ANOVA post-hoc Bonferroni (*) (none n = 5, PMA n = 7, LPS n = 7, glucose n = 5). Error Bars +/- SEM.
Fig 3
Fig 3. NETs formed by S. aureus and E. coli 20 minutes after stimulation for one hour.
DNA (Hoechst, blue, 405) and Extracelullar DNA (PI, red, 561) were stained.
Fig 4
Fig 4. NETosis per inducer comparing the effect of platelets and the effect of activated platelets supernatant (n = 5, n = 7 respectively).
NETosis was defined as the ratio between Hoechst and PI positive cells. Neutrophils stimulated by platelets were compared against neutrophils stimulated by LPS, platelets + LPS, activated platelets, activated platelets + LPS, activated platelets supernatant, activated platelets supernatant + LPS using repeated measures ANOVA post-hoc Bonferroni (*). No significant differences were found (p>0.05 all). Error Bars +/- SEM.
Fig 5
Fig 5. The effect of Ionomycin compared to PMA.
(A) Time lapse images of PMA and Ionomycin at different time frames. The arrows indicate the decondensation of the nuclei before (Hoechst, 405) and after (PI, 561) DNA extrusion. (B) The amount of Hoechst and PI positive cells in PMA and Ionomycin stimulated cells and unstimulated cells, show the difference in the process of NETosis. In the PMA stimulated cells, the number of Hoechst positive cells go down as the PI positive cells (NETosis) go up. In the Ionomycin stimulated cells, the number of PI positive cells go up very rapidly, but the Hoechst positive cells remain similar. In unstimulated cells, the intensity of Hoechst staining remains high and no PI staining was detected.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science. 2004;303(5663):1532–5. Epub 2004/03/06. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farrera C, Fadeel B. Macrophage clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps is a silent process. J Immunol. 2013;191(5):2647–56. Epub 2013/08/02. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300436 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, Schatzberg D, Monestier M, Myers DD Jr., et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(36):15880–5. Epub 2010/08/28. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2936604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fuchs TA, Brill A, Wagner DD. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) impact on deep vein thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(8):1777–83. Epub 2012/06/02. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3495595. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.242859 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Longstaff C, Varju I, Sotonyi P, Szabo L, Krumrey M, Hoell A, et al. Mechanical stability and fibrinolytic resistance of clots containing fibrin, DNA, and histones. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(10):6946–56. Epub 2013/01/08. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3591605. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.404301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Trombosestichting: TSN2013-2 (https://www.trombosestichting.nl/, received by MPMdM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
chat 1
twitter 2