Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements and Pathologist-Assigned Steatosis Grades of Liver Biopsies From Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
- PMID: 28624576
- PMCID: PMC5695870
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.005
Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements and Pathologist-Assigned Steatosis Grades of Liver Biopsies From Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Abstract
Background & aims: We assessed the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in grading hepatic steatosis and change in hepatic steatosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in a multi-center study, using central histology as reference.
Methods: We collected data from 113 adults with NASH participating in a multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial to compare the efficacy cross-sectionally and longitudinally of obeticholic acid vs placebo. Hepatic steatosis was assessed at baseline and after 72 weeks of obeticholic acid or placebo by liver biopsy and MRI (scanners from different manufacturers, at 1.5T or 3T). We compared steatosis estimates by PDFF vs histology. Histologic steatosis grade was scored in consensus by a pathology committee. Cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.
Results: At baseline, 34% of subjects had steatosis grade 0 or 1, 39% had steatosis grade 2, and 27% had steatosis grade 3; corresponding mean PDFF values were 9.8%±3.7%, 18.1%±4.3%, and 30.1%±8.1%. PDFF classified steatosis grade 0-1 vs 2-3 with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and grade 0-2 vs grade 3 steatosis with an AUROC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99). PDFF cut-off values at 90% specificity were 16.3% for grades 2-3 and 21.7% for grade 3, with corresponding sensitivities of 83% and 84%. After 72 weeks' of obeticholic vs placebo, 42% of subjects had a reduced steatosis grade (mean reduction in PDFF from baseline of 7.4%±8.7%), 49% had no change in steatosis grade (mean increase in PDFF from baseline of 0.3%±6.3%), and 9% had an increased steatosis grade (mean increase in PDFF from baseline of 7.7%±6.0%). PDFF change identified subjects with reduced steatosis grade with an AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91) and increased steatosis grade with an AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63-0.99). A PDFF reduction of 5.15% identified subjects with reduced steatosis grade with 90% specificity and 58% sensitivity, whereas a PDFF increase of 5.6% identified those with increased steatosis grade with 90% specificity and 57% sensitivity.
Conclusions: Based on data from a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of adults with NASH, PDFF estimated by MRI scanners of different field strength and at different sites, accurately classifies grades and changes in hepatic steatosis when histologic analysis of biopsies is used as a reference.
Keywords: Direct Comparison; FLINT; NAFLD; Non-Invasive.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Will the magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction replace liver biopsy as the gold standard for detecting steatosis?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Aug;7(4):292-293. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.04.02. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018. PMID: 30221157 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction and Liver Histology Features in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1428-1435.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Gastroenterology. 2018. PMID: 30031769 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging hepatic proton density fat fraction in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Hepatology. 2018 Mar;67(3):858-872. doi: 10.1002/hep.29596. Epub 2018 Jan 26. Hepatology. 2018. PMID: 29028128 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Magnetic Resonance Elastography vs Transient Elastography in Detection of Fibrosis and Noninvasive Measurement of Steatosis in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):598-607.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Oct 27. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 27911262 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of MRI-PDFF for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3564-3573. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06072-4. Epub 2019 Mar 21. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30899974 Review.
-
Change in MRI-PDFF and Histologic Response in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Nov;19(11):2274-2283.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.061. Epub 2020 Aug 31. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 32882428 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Validating a non-invasive, ALT-based non-alcoholic fatty liver phenotype in the million veteran program.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0237430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237430. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32841307 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Diagnostic Biomarkers, Omics Strategies, and Single-Cell Sequencing for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Severely Obese Patients.J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 1;10(5):930. doi: 10.3390/jcm10050930. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33804302 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative MRI in cardiometabolic disease: From conventional cardiac and liver tissue mapping techniques to multi-parametric approaches.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 23;9:991383. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.991383. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 36756640 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hepatic steatosis and reduction in steatosis following bariatric weight loss surgery differs between segments and lobes.Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2474-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5894-0. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30547206 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Gastroenterology. 2019 Apr;156(5):1264-1281.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Jan 18. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMID: 30660725 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Loomba R, Sanyal AJ. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:686–690. - PubMed
-
- Wanless IR, Lentz JS. Fatty liver hepatitis (steatohepatitis) and obesity: an autopsy study with analysis of risk factors. Hepatology. 1990;12:1106–1110. - PubMed
-
- Lazo M, Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liv Dis. 2008;28:339–350. - PubMed
-
- Machado M, Marques-Vidal P, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic histology obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2006;45:600–606. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- U01 DK061737/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061713/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061732/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061731/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061718/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001442/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000006/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000058/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001108/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000436/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061730/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061728/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- Z99 CA999999/Intramural NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000439/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061738/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000448/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DK061734/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002319/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000423/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000100/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000004/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002345/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical