Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Sep;153(3):753-761.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements and Pathologist-Assigned Steatosis Grades of Liver Biopsies From Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements and Pathologist-Assigned Steatosis Grades of Liver Biopsies From Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Michael S Middleton et al. Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background & aims: We assessed the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in grading hepatic steatosis and change in hepatic steatosis in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in a multi-center study, using central histology as reference.

Methods: We collected data from 113 adults with NASH participating in a multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial to compare the efficacy cross-sectionally and longitudinally of obeticholic acid vs placebo. Hepatic steatosis was assessed at baseline and after 72 weeks of obeticholic acid or placebo by liver biopsy and MRI (scanners from different manufacturers, at 1.5T or 3T). We compared steatosis estimates by PDFF vs histology. Histologic steatosis grade was scored in consensus by a pathology committee. Cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed.

Results: At baseline, 34% of subjects had steatosis grade 0 or 1, 39% had steatosis grade 2, and 27% had steatosis grade 3; corresponding mean PDFF values were 9.8%±3.7%, 18.1%±4.3%, and 30.1%±8.1%. PDFF classified steatosis grade 0-1 vs 2-3 with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and grade 0-2 vs grade 3 steatosis with an AUROC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.99). PDFF cut-off values at 90% specificity were 16.3% for grades 2-3 and 21.7% for grade 3, with corresponding sensitivities of 83% and 84%. After 72 weeks' of obeticholic vs placebo, 42% of subjects had a reduced steatosis grade (mean reduction in PDFF from baseline of 7.4%±8.7%), 49% had no change in steatosis grade (mean increase in PDFF from baseline of 0.3%±6.3%), and 9% had an increased steatosis grade (mean increase in PDFF from baseline of 7.7%±6.0%). PDFF change identified subjects with reduced steatosis grade with an AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91) and increased steatosis grade with an AUROC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63-0.99). A PDFF reduction of 5.15% identified subjects with reduced steatosis grade with 90% specificity and 58% sensitivity, whereas a PDFF increase of 5.6% identified those with increased steatosis grade with 90% specificity and 57% sensitivity.

Conclusions: Based on data from a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of adults with NASH, PDFF estimated by MRI scanners of different field strength and at different sites, accurately classifies grades and changes in hepatic steatosis when histologic analysis of biopsies is used as a reference.

Keywords: Direct Comparison; FLINT; NAFLD; Non-Invasive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PDFF distribution of study population at baseline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar and whisker plot at baseline of PDFF vs steatosis grade. For each steatosis grade, maximum and minimum PDFF values are indicated by horizontal lines at the bottom and top of each steatosis grade entry, the darkened box in the middle represents PDFF data points in the 25% to 75% interquartile range, and the line through the middle of the central darkened box represents the median PDFF value.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bar and whisker plot of change in PDFF vs change in histologic hepatic steatosis grade. Mean PDFF change values for steatosis grade reduction, no change in steatosis grade, and increase in steatosis grade were, respectively: −7.4%± 8.7% (n=42), 0.3%±6.3% (n=49), and 7.7%± 6.0% (n=9). Explanations of each bar-and-whisker plot entry are as noted for Figure 2, except that in this figure values represent PDFF change, the maximum and minimum PDFF change values that are indicated by horizontal lines at the bottom and top of each steatosis grade entry exclude outliers, and the isolated dots represent outliers.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Machado MV, Cortez-Pinto H. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: What the clinician needs to know. World J Gastroenterology. 2014;20:12956–12980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loomba R, Sanyal AJ. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10:686–690. - PubMed
    1. Wanless IR, Lentz JS. Fatty liver hepatitis (steatohepatitis) and obesity: an autopsy study with analysis of risk factors. Hepatology. 1990;12:1106–1110. - PubMed
    1. Lazo M, Clark JM. The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective. Semin Liv Dis. 2008;28:339–350. - PubMed
    1. Machado M, Marques-Vidal P, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic histology obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2006;45:600–606. - PubMed

Publication types

  NODES
Association 2
Note 1
twitter 2