MR Spectroscopy-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction Is Superior to Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Detecting and Grading Hepatic Steatosis
- PMID: 28915103
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162931
MR Spectroscopy-derived Proton Density Fat Fraction Is Superior to Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Detecting and Grading Hepatic Steatosis
Abstract
Purpose To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) obtained with transient elastography and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) obtained with proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy with results of liver biopsy in a cohort of adult patients suspected of having nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and Methods The institutional review board approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The authors evaluated 55 patients suspected of having NAFLD (40 men, 15 women). Patients had a median age of 52.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43.7-57.6 years) and a median body mass index of 27.8 kg/m2 (IQR, 26.0-33.1 kg/m2). CAP and PDFF measurements were obtained on the same day, within 27 days of biopsy (IQR, 7-44 days). CAP and PDFF were compared between steatosis grades by using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Diagnostic accuracies of CAP and PDFF for grading steatosis were assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Within-weeks reproducibility (CAP and PDFF) and within-session repeatability were assessed with linear regression analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients, and coefficients of variation. Results Steatosis grades at liver biopsy were distributed as follows: S0, five patients; S1, 24 patients; S2, 17 patients; and S3, nine patients. Both PDFF and CAP helped detect histologically proven steatosis (≥S1), but PDFF showed better diagnostic accuracy than CAP in terms of the area under the ROC curve (0.99 vs 0.77, respectively; P = .0334). PDFF, but not CAP, enabled the grading of steatosis (P < .0001). For within-weeks reproducibility, the intraclass correlation coefficient with PDFF was higher than that with CAP (0.95 vs 0.65, respectively; P = .0015); coefficients of variation were similar (19% vs 11%, P = .55). Within-session repeatability of CAP was good, with a coefficient of variation of 4.5%. Conclusion MR spectroscopy-derived PDFF is superior to CAP in detecting and grading liver steatosis in human NAFLD. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Comment in
-
Quantitative MR Imaging Is Increasingly Important in Liver Disease.Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):557-559. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017172312. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 29356638 No abstract available.
-
[Non-invasive quantification of liver fat].Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;56(3):303-304. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122256. Epub 2018 Mar 12. Z Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29529683 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography.Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar;150(3):626-637.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.048. Epub 2015 Dec 8. Gastroenterology. 2016. PMID: 26677985
-
Prospective comparison of transient elastography, MRI and serum scores for grading steatosis and detecting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in bariatric surgery candidates.JHEP Rep. 2021 Sep 30;3(6):100381. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100381. eCollection 2021 Dec. JHEP Rep. 2021. PMID: 34786549 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled attenuation parameter for the detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(7):1470-6. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12557. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 24548002
-
Linearity, Bias, and Precision of Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction Measurements by Using MR Imaging: A Meta-Analysis.Radiology. 2018 Feb;286(2):486-498. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170550. Epub 2017 Sep 11. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 28892458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter as a noninvasive test for steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021 Oct;48(4):471-480. doi: 10.1007/s10396-021-01123-0. Epub 2021 Aug 20. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021. PMID: 34415481 Review.
Cited by
-
Unenhanced computed tomography for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis with low tube potential protocol.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Feb;12(2):1348-1358. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-474. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022. PMID: 35111629 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Elastography in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Curr Health Sci J. 2020 Jul-Sep;46(3):255-269. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.46.03.07. Epub 2020 Sep 30. Curr Health Sci J. 2020. PMID: 33304627 Free PMC article.
-
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Pathogenesis and Noninvasive Diagnosis.Biomedicines. 2021 Dec 22;10(1):15. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010015. Biomedicines. 2021. PMID: 35052690 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative ultrasound approaches for diagnosis and monitoring hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Theranostics. 2020 Mar 4;10(9):4277-4289. doi: 10.7150/thno.40249. eCollection 2020. Theranostics. 2020. PMID: 32226553 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quantitative US fat fraction for noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis in suspected metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.Insights Imaging. 2024 Jun 21;15(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01728-2. Insights Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38902550 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous