Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):408.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5269-0.

Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiometabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations

Socioeconomic inequalities in cardiometabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Berta Ibáñez et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine if the achievement of control _targets in patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with personal socioeconomic factors and if these associations were sex-dependent.

Methods: This cross-sectional, population-based study was conducted in Spain. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level and other clinical parameters were obtained from electronic primary care records (n = 32,638 cases). Socioeconomic status was determined using education level and yearly income. Among patients, having their HbA1c level checked during the previous year was considered as an indirect measure of the process of care, whereas tobacco use and clinical parameters such as HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and blood pressure (BP) were considered intermediate control outcomes. General linear mixed effect models were used to assess associations.

Results: The achievement of metabolic and cardiovascular control _targets in patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with educational level and income, and socioeconomic gradients differed by sex. The probability of having had an HbA1c test performed in the previous year was higher in patients with lower education levels. Patients in the lowest income and education level categories were less likely to have reached the recommended HbA1c level. Males in the lowest education level categories were less likely to be non-smokers or to have achieved the blood pressure _targets. In contrast, patients within the low income categories had a higher probability of reaching the recommended LDL-c level.

Conclusions: Our results suggest the presence of socioeconomic inequalities in the achievement of cardiovascular and metabolic control that differed in direction and magnitude depending on the measured outcome and sex of the patient. These findings may help health professionals focus on high-risk individuals to decrease health inequalities.

Keywords: Cardiometabolic risk factors; Cardiovascular control; Diabetes care; Diabetes mellitus; Glycated haemoglobin; Metabolic control; Socioeconomic inequalities; Socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study, which was observational in design, retrospective in nature; and used data irreversibly anonymized prior to transfer to the research team, was conducted in accordance with the amended Helsinki Declaration, International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies and Spanish laws on data protection and patients’ rights. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Navarre (Project 67/2013, session on October 30th, 2013).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. IDF diabetes atlas, eight edition: Brussels, International Diabetes Federation; 2017. http://www.diabetesatlas.org/. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.
    1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–2222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong ND, Zhao Y, Patel R, et al. Cardiovascular risk factor _targets and cardiovascular disease event risk in diabetes: a pooling project of the atherosclerosis risk in communities study, multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis, and Jackson heart study. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(5):668–676. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(S1):S39–S80. - PubMed
    1. Vinagre I, Mata-Cases M, Hermosilla E, et al. Control of glycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Catalonia (Spain) Diabetes Care. 2012;35:774–779. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1679. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

  NODES
Association 4
Idea 4
idea 4
INTERN 4
Note 1
Project 2
twitter 2