Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;19(1):53-70.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Dental Patients: A Systematic Review

Hina Mittal  1 , Mike T John  1 , Stella Sekulić  2 , Nicole Theis-Mahon  3 , Ksenija Rener-Sitar  4
Affiliations

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Adult Dental Patients: A Systematic Review

Hina Mittal et al. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used beside disease-oriented outcomes (eg, number of teeth, clinical attachment level) to better capture the impact of diseases or interventions. To assess PROs for dental patients (dPROs), dental PRO measures (dPROMs) are applied. The aim of this systematic review was to identify generic dPROMs for adult patients and the dPROs.

Methods: This systematic review searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases along with hand searching, through December 2017, to identify English-language, multi-item dPROMs that are oral health generic, that is, they are applicable to a broad range of adult patients.

Results: We identified 20 questionnaires that contained 36 unique dPROs. They were measured by 53 dPROMs. dPRO names (N = 36) suggested they could be grouped into four dPRO categories: (1) Oral Function (N = 11), Orofacial Pain (N = 7), Orofacial Appearance (N = 3), and Psychosocial Impact (N = 14), as well as an additional dPRO that represented perceived oral health in general. Only eight questionnaires had a specific recall or reference period. dPROM's score dimensionality was only investigated in 13 of the 20 questionnaires.

Conclusions: The identified 36 dPROs represent the major aspects of an adult dental patient's oral health experience; however, four major dPRO categories, that is, Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact, summarize how patients are impacted. If multi-item, oral health-generic dPROMs are to be used to measure patients' suffering, the 53 dPROMs represent current available tools. Limitations of the majority of these dPROMs include incomplete knowledge about their dimensionality, which affects their validity, and an unspecified recall period, which reduces their clinical applicability.

Keywords: Dimensionality; Oral health; Patient-reported outcome; Patient-reported outcome measure; Quality of life; Questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest:

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart of included studies
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Linking dPROMs to their dPROs. dPROMs are represented as rectangles (orange). dPROs are represented as rounded rectangles.
* authors developed two dPROMs for the same dPRO; # authors developed four dPROMs for the same dPRO; $ first of the two attributes was used for linking with broader dPRO
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gwaltney CJ. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in dental clinical trials and product development: introduction to scientific and regulatory considerations. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010;10(2):86–90. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. John MT. Health outcomes reported by dental patients. J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2018, 10.1016/j.jebdp.2018.09.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994;11(1):3–11. - PubMed
    1. Atchison KA, Dolan TA. Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 1990;54(11):680–687. - PubMed

Publication types

  NODES
COMMUNITY 1
twitter 2