Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;139(3):309-331.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-02047-z. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DNA damage in aging, the stem cell perspective

Affiliations
Review

DNA damage in aging, the stem cell perspective

Taylor McNeely et al. Hum Genet. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

DNA damage is one of the most consistent cellular process proposed to contribute to aging. The maintenance of genomic and epigenomic integrity is critical for proper function of cells and tissues throughout life, and this homeostasis is under constant strain from both extrinsic and intrinsic insults. Considering the relationship between lifespan and genotoxic burden, it is plausible that the longest-lived cellular populations would face an accumulation of DNA damage over time. Tissue-specific stem cells are multipotent populations residing in localized niches and are responsible for maintaining all lineages of their resident tissue/system throughout life. However, many of these stem cells are impacted by genotoxic stress. Several factors may dictate the specific stem cell population response to DNA damage, including the niche location, life history, and fate decisions after damage accrual. This leads to differential handling of DNA damage in different stem cell compartments. Given the importance of adult stem cells in preserving normal tissue function during an individual's lifetime, DNA damage sensitivity and accumulation in these compartments could have crucial implications for aging. Despite this, more support for direct functional effects driven by accumulated DNA damage in adult stem cell compartments is needed. This review will present current evidence for the accumulation and potential influence of DNA damage in adult tissue-specific stem cells and propose inquiry directions that could benefit individual healthspan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Classification and aging phenotypes of adult somatic stem cells. * negative for mouse ** See text for references

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acharya MM, Lan ML, Kan VH, Patel NH, Giedzinski E, Tseng BP, and Limoli CL. 2010. ‘Consequences of ionizing radiation-induced damage in human neural stem cells’, Free Radic Biol Med, 49: 1846–55. - PubMed
    1. Ahlenius H, Visan V, Kokaia M, Lindvall O, and Kokaia Z. 2009. ‘Neural stem and progenitor cells retain their potential for proliferation and differentiation into functional neurons despite lower number in aged brain’, J Neurosci, 29: 4408–19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahlqvist KJ, Hamalainen RH, Yatsuga S, Uutela M, Terzioglu M, Gotz A, Forsstrom S, Salven P, Angers-Loustau A, Kopra OH, Tyynismaa H, Larsson NG, Wartiovaara K, Prolla T, Trifunovic A, and Suomalainen A. 2012. ‘Somatic progenitor cell vulnerability to mitochondrial DNA mutagenesis underlies progeroid phenotypes in Polg mutator mice’, Cell Metab, 15: 100–9. - PubMed
    1. Ahmed EA, van der Vaart A, Barten A, Kal HB, Chen J, Lou Z, Minter-Dykhouse K, Bartkova J, Bartek J, de Boer P, and de Rooij DG. 2007. ‘Differences in DNA double strand breaks repair in male germ cell types: lessons learned from a differential expression of Mdc1 and 53BP1’, DNA Repair (Amst), 6: 1243–54. - PubMed
    1. Allen DM, van Praag H, Ray J, Weaver Z, Winrow CJ, Carter TA, Braquet R, Harrington E, Ried T, Brown KD, Gage FH, and Barlow C. 2001. ‘Ataxia telangiectasia mutated is essential during adult neurogenesis’, Genes Dev, 15: 554–66. - PMC - PubMed
  NODES
twitter 2