Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;175(6):831-837.
doi: 10.7326/M22-0308. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Comparison of Patients Infected With Delta Versus Omicron COVID-19 Variants Presenting to Paris Emergency Departments : A Retrospective Cohort Study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Comparison of Patients Infected With Delta Versus Omicron COVID-19 Variants Presenting to Paris Emergency Departments : A Retrospective Cohort Study

Donia Bouzid et al. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: At the end of 2021, the B.1.1.529 SARS-CoV-2 variant (Omicron) wave superseded the B.1.617.2 variant (Delta) wave.

Objective: To compare baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Delta variant versus the Omicron variant in the emergency department (ED).

Design: Retrospective chart reviews.

Setting: 13 adult EDs in academic hospitals in the Paris area from 29 November 2021 to 10 January 2022.

Patients: Patients with a positive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test result for SARS-CoV-2 and variant identification.

Measurements: Main outcome measures were baseline clinical and biological characteristics at ED presentation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality.

Results: A total of 3728 patients had a positive RT-PCR test result for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period; 1716 patients who had a variant determination (818 Delta and 898 Omicron) were included. Median age was 58 years, and 49% were women. Patients infected with the Omicron variant were younger (54 vs. 62 years; difference, 8.0 years [95% CI, 4.6 to 11.4 years]), had a lower rate of obesity (8.0% vs. 12.5%; difference, 4.5 percentage points [CI, 1.5 to 7.5 percentage points]), were more vaccinated (65% vs. 39% for 1 dose and 22% vs. 11% for 3 doses), had a lower rate of dyspnea (26% vs. 50%; difference, 23.6 percentage points [CI, 19.0 to 28.2 percentage points]), and had a higher rate of discharge home from the ED (59% vs. 37%; difference, 21.9 percentage points [-26.5 to -17.1 percentage points]). Compared with Delta, Omicron infection was independently associated with a lower risk for ICU admission (adjusted difference, 11.4 percentage points [CI, 8.4 to 14.4 percentage points]), mechanical ventilation (adjusted difference, 3.6 percentage points [CI, 1.7 to 5.6 percentage points]), and in-hospital mortality (adjusted difference, 4.2 percentage points [CI, 2.0 to 6.5 percentage points]).

Limitation: Patients with COVID-19 illness and no SARS-CoV-2 variant determination in the ED were excluded.

Conclusion: Compared with the Delta variant, infection with the Omicron variant in patients in the ED had different clinical and biological patterns and was associated with better in-hospital outcomes, including higher survival.

Primary funding source: None.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M22-0308.

Figures

Visual Abstract.
Visual Abstract.. Patients With Delta Versus Omicron Variants in the Emergency Department.
At the end of 2021, infections with the B.1.1.529 SARS-CoV-2 variant (Omicron) superseded those with the B.1.617.2 variant (Delta). This study compares baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients who presented to 13 emergency departments in Paris from 29 November 2021 to 10 January 2022.
Figure.
Figure.. Study flow diagram.
RT-PCR = reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. * Patients in whom the variant could not have been identified were excluded. † The RT-PCR analyses in staff members were not included in the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fontanet A , Autran B , Lina B , et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants and ending the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;397:952-954. [PMID: ] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00370-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dyson L , Hill EM , Moore S , et al. Possible future waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection generated by variants of concern with a range of characteristics. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5730. [PMID: ] doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25915-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Update on Omicron. Accessed at www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2021-update-on-omicron on 7 January 2022.
    1. Karim SSA , Karim QA . Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: a new chapter in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398:2126-2128. [PMID: ] doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02758-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santé publique France. InfoCovidFrance: Chiffres clés et évolution de la COVID-19 en France et dans le Monde. Accessed at www.santepubliquefrance.fr/dossiers/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-chi... on 7 January 2022.

Supplementary concepts

  NODES
chat 4
INTERN 3
twitter 2