Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 28;12(1):18174.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22767-z.

A 3-step approach to predict advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: impact on diagnosis, patient burden, and medical costs

Affiliations

A 3-step approach to predict advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: impact on diagnosis, patient burden, and medical costs

Takashi Kobayashi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

A 2-step approach, Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) followed by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), has been proposed to predict advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to develop a novel 3-step approach for predicting advanced fibrosis. We enrolled 284 biopsy-confirmed NAFLD patients from two tertiary care centers and developed subgroups (n = 190), including 3.7% of patients with advanced fibrosis, assuming a primary care setting. In the 3-step approach, patients with intermediate-to-high FIB-4 in the first step underwent an enhanced liver fibrosis test or measurement of type IV collagen 7S domain as the second step, and VCTE was performed if the second step value was higher than the cutoff. In 284 cases, a tertiary care cohort with 36.3% advanced fibrosis, the 3-step approach showed significantly higher specificity and positive predictive value than the 2-step approach. In the subgroup with 3.7% advanced fibrosis, the 3-step approach significantly reduced the referral rate to specialists, the number of high-risk patients (i.e., liver biopsy candidates), and healthcare costs by 12.5% to 15.8%. The 3-step approach may improve the diagnostic performance to predict advanced fibrosis in NAFLD, which could lower rates of referrals to specialists, liver biopsies, and medical costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Performance of each approach in the tertiary care center cohort. Number and percentages of patients evaluated using the (a) 2-step approach, (b) 3-step approach with ELF, and (c) 3-step approach with T4C7S. The numbers in the boxes and parentheses are the sum of the total patients and the number of patients without advanced fibrosis/number of patients with advanced fibrosis, respectively. The numbers on the lines are the percentages among patients with a FIB-4 score of ≥ 1.30. AF, advanced fibrosis; ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis test; FIB-4, Fibrosis-4 index; T4C7S, type IV collagen 7S domain; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of each approach applied to a cohort with a low prevalence of advanced fibrosis (3.7%); the 3-step approach can reduce patient referral and liver biopsy rates without losing diagnostic performance. The numbers listed are means. ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis test; FIB-4, Fibrosis-4 index; T4C7S, type IV collagen 7S domain; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Our novel 3-step approach. The application of this approach will increase the number of patients seen by primary care physicians and decrease the number of specialist referrals. Patients considered at low risk using this approach only need to be followed up by a primary care physician, whereas those considered at high risk need to undergo additional evaluations, including liver biopsy. ELF, enhanced liver fibrosis test; FIB-4, Fibrosis-4 index; T4C7S, type IV collagen 7S domain; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography.

Similar articles

References

    1. Younossi ZM, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. doi: 10.1002/hep.28431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loomba R, Sanyal AJ. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013;10:686–690. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hagström H, et al. Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J. Hepatol. 2017;67:1265–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.07.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sumida Y, et al. Epidemiology: Pathogenesis, and diagnostic strategy of diabetic liver disease in Japan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:4337. doi: 10.3390/ijms21124337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan WK, et al. Optimizing use of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score, fibrosis-4 score, and liver stiffness measurement to identify patients with advanced fibrosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;17:2570–2580.e37. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.03.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

  NODES
INTERN 2
twitter 2