Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06982-7.

Safety of AFM11 in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies: findings from two phase 1 studies

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Safety of AFM11 in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies: findings from two phase 1 studies

Max Topp et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: The prognosis for patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) remains poor, with existing treatments having significant side effects. Developed for the treatment of these cancers, AFM11 is a tetravalent, bispecific humanised recombinant antibody construct (TandAb®) designed to bind to human CD19 and CD3 and lead to the activation of T cells inducing apoptosis and killing of malignant B cells.

Methods: Two open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation phase 1 studies evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and activity of AFM11 in patients with R/R CD19-positive B cell NHL (AFM11-101) and in patients with CD19 + B-precursor Philadelphia-chromosome negative ALL (AFM11-102). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and recorded; imaging (NHL) or bone marrow assessment (ALL) were used to evaluate response. Additional pharmacodynamic assays undertaken included cytokine release analysis and B-cell and T-cell depletion.

Results: In AFM11-101, 16 patients with R/R NHL received AFM11 in five different dose cohorts. Of which, 14 experienced drug-related treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) [including five serious AEs (SAEs)], five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and ten patients discontinued the study. The high number of neurological events led to a decrease in infusion frequency during the study. No objective response to treatment was observed. In AFM11-102, 17 patients with R/R ALL received AFM11 in six different dose cohorts. Thirteen patients experienced drug-related TEAEs (including four SAEs), DLTs occurred in two patients and five patients discontinued the study. An objective response was recorded in three patients. The maximum tolerated dose could not be determined in either study due to early termination.

Conclusions: AFM11 treatment was associated with frequent neurological adverse reactions that were severe in some patients. In ALL, some signs of activity, albeit short-lived, were observed whereas no activity was observed in patients with NHL; therefore, further clinical development was terminated.

Trial registration: NCT02106091 . Safety Study to Assess AFM11 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory CD19 Positive B-cell NHL. Registered April 2014. NCT02848911 . Safety Study to Assess AFM11 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Adult B-precursor ALL. Registered July 2016.

Keywords: AFM11; Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; Neurotoxicity; Non-Hodgkin lymphoma; T-cell engager.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SES, KP and UG are employees of Affimed GmbH. AS and LA were employees of Affimed GmbH at the time of the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram. Dose of AFM11 by cohort (cycle 1 week 1, cycle 1 week 2 onward) was as follows: cohort 1, 0.0007 μg/kg/week, 0.002 μg/kg/week; cohort 2, 0.002 μg/kg/week, 0.006 μg/kg/week; cohort 3, 0.007 μg/kg/week, 0.02 μg/kg/week; cohort 4, 0.02 μg/kg/week, 0.06 μg/kg/week; cohort 5, 0.06 μg/kg/week, 0.18 μg/kg/week; cohort 6, 0.13 μg/kg/week, 0.4 μg/kg/week

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wild C, Weiderpass E, Stewart B, editors. World cancer report: cancer research for cancer prevention. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. http://publications.iarc.fr/586.
    1. Chao MP. Treatment challenges in the management of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma - novel and emerging therapies. Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:251–269. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S34273. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Leukemia – Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL). https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/alyl.html.
    1. Fielding AK, Richards SM, Chopra R, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, Buck G, et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood. 2007;109(3):944–950. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-018192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gökbuget N, Dombret H, Ribera JM, Fielding AK, Advani A, Bassan R, et al. International reference analysis of outcomes in adults with B-precursor Ph-negative relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2016;101(12):1524–1533. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.144311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
INTERN 2
twitter 2