Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Feb 9;388(6):489-498.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212083.

Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Nasser Altorki et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: The increased detection of small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has renewed interest in sublobar resection in lieu of lobectomy.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, phase 3 trial in which patients with NSCLC clinically staged as T1aN0 (tumor size, ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned to undergo sublobar resection or lobar resection after intraoperative confirmation of node-negative disease. The primary end point was disease-free survival, defined as the time between randomization and disease recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points were overall survival, locoregional and systemic recurrence, and pulmonary functions.

Results: From June 2007 through March 2017, a total of 697 patients were assigned to undergo sublobar resection (340 patients) or lobar resection (357 patients). After a median follow-up of 7 years, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobar resection for disease-free survival (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 1.01; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.24). In addition, overall survival after sublobar resection was similar to that after lobar resection (hazard ratio for death, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26). The 5-year disease-free survival was 63.6% (95% CI, 57.9 to 68.8) after sublobar resection and 64.1% (95% CI, 58.5 to 69.0) after lobar resection. The 5-year overall survival was 80.3% (95% CI, 75.5 to 84.3) after sublobar resection and 78.9% (95% CI, 74.1 to 82.9) after lobar resection. No substantial difference was seen between the two groups in the incidence of locoregional or distant recurrence. At 6 months postoperatively, a between-group difference of 2 percentage points was measured in the median percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, favoring the sublobar-resection group.

Conclusions: In patients with peripheral NSCLC with a tumor size of 2 cm or less and pathologically confirmed node-negative disease in the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, sublobar resection was not inferior to lobectomy with respect to disease-free survival. Overall survival was similar with the two procedures. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; CALGB 140503 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00499330.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Disease-free and Overall Survival.
The shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Exploratory Subgroup Analysis of Disease-free Survival.
Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with the use of unstratified Cox proportional-hazards models. The size of the squares indicating the hazard ratios is proportional to the number of patients included in the analysis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Recurrence-free Survival and Cause of Death.
Panel A shows recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Recurrence-free survival was defined as the time between randomization and the occurrence of locoregional or distant recurrence; all other events, including death from any cause, were censored at the occurrence of these events. The shaded areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Panel B shows cumulative-incidence functions for death related to lung cancer as compared with death not related to lung cancer; four patients with an unknown cause of death (three in the lobar-resection group and one in the sublobar-resection group) were excluded from the analysis. In both panels, the widths of the confidence intervals have not been adjusted for multiplicity and may not be used in place of hypothesis testing.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV; Lung Cancer Study Group. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:615–23. - PubMed
    1. Altorki NK, Yip R, Hanaoka T, et al. Sublobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for clinical stage 1A lung cancer in solid nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:754–64. - PubMed
    1. Onaitis MW, Furnary AP, Kosinski AS, et al. Equivalent survival between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical stage IA lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:1882–91. - PubMed
    1. Landreneau RJ, Normolle DP, Christie NA, et al. Recurrence and survival outcomes after anatomic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensitymatched analysis. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2449–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kates M, Swanson S, Wisnivesky JP. Survival following lobectomy and limited resection for the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer<=1 cm in size: a review of SEER data. Chest 2011;139:491–6. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

  NODES
INTERN 1
twitter 2