Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug;10(8):4971-4984.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.1822. Epub 2023 May 21.

Patient engagement practice within perinatal eHealth: A scoping review

Affiliations
Review

Patient engagement practice within perinatal eHealth: A scoping review

Jennifer N Auxier et al. Nurs Open. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: There is a gap in knowledge about how perinatal eHealth programs function to support autonomy for new and expectant parents from pursuing wellness goals.

Objectives: To examine patient engagement (access, personalization, commitment and therapeutic alliance) within the practice of perinatal eHealth.

Design: Scoping review.

Methods: Five databases were searched in January 2020 and updated in April 2022. Reports were vetted by three researchers and included if they documented maternity/neonatal programs and utilized World Health Organization (WHO) person-centred digital health intervention (DHI) categories. Data were charted using a deductive matrix containing WHO DHI categories and patient engagement attributes. A narrative synthesis was conducted utilizing qualitative content analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 'extension for scoping reviews' guidelines were followed for reporting.

Results: Twelve eHealth modalities were found across 80 included articles. The analysis yielded two conceptual insights: (1) The nature of perinatal eHealth programs: (1) emergence of a complex structure of practice and (2) practising patient engagement within perinatal eHealth.

Conclusion: Results will be used to operationalize a model of patient engagement within perinatal eHealth.

Keywords: implementation; perinatal care; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for updated systematic reviews.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Perinatal eHealth programs and modalities.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Treatments within Perinatal eHealth programs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbass‐Dick, J. , Xie, F. , Koroluk, J. , Alcock Brillinger, S. , Huizinga, J. , Newport, A. , Goodman, W. M. , & Dennis, C. L. (2017). The development and piloting of an eHealth breastfeeding resource _targeting fathers and partners as co‐parents. Midwifery, 50, 139–147. 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aisien . (2021). The puerperium. In contemporary obstetrics and gynecology for developing countries. Springer, Champions.
    1. Auxier, J. , Savolainen, K. T. , Bender, M. , Rahmani, A. M. , Sarhaddi, F. , Azimi, I. , & Axelin, A. M. (2023). Exploring access as a process of adaptation in a self‐monitoring perinatal ehealth system: Mixed methods study from a sociomaterial perspective. JMIR Formative Research, 7, e44385. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auxier, J. N. (2017). The influence of environments on fear of childbirth during women's intrapartum hospital stays. (Master's Thesis). The University of British Columbia. cIRcle repository.
    1. Banerjee, J. , Aloysius, A. , Mitchell, K. , Silva, I. , Rallis, D. , Godambe, S. V. , & Deierl, A. (2020). Improving infant outcomes through implementation of a family integrated care bundle including a parent supporting mobile application. Archives of Disease in Childhood ‐ Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 105(2), 172–177. 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316435 - DOI - PubMed
  NODES
INTERN 4
twitter 2