Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Nov;118(5):1055-1066.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 17.

Improvements in dietary intake, behaviors, and psychosocial measures in a community-randomized cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities 2.0

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improvements in dietary intake, behaviors, and psychosocial measures in a community-randomized cardiovascular disease risk reduction intervention: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities 2.0

Alexandra L MacMillan Uribe et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence has disproportionately risen among midlife and older female adults of rural communities, partly due to poor diet and diet-related behaviors and psychosocial factors that impede healthy eating.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of Strong Hearts Healthy Communities 2.0 (SHHC-2.0) on secondary diet-related outcomes between intervention and control participants that align with the dietary goal and behavioral aims of the SHHC-2.0, a CVD risk reduction program.

Methods: A community-randomized controlled trial was conducted in rural, medically underserved communities. Participants were female adults ≥40 y who were classified as obese or both overweight and sedentary. Communities were randomized to SHHC-2.0 intervention (n = 5 communities; n = 87 participants) or control (with delayed intervention) (n = 6 communities; n = 95 participants). SHHC-2.0 consisted of 24 wk of twice-weekly experiential nutrition education and group-based physical activity classes led by local health educators. Changes between baseline and end point (24 wk) in dietary intake (24-h recalls), dietary behaviors (e.g., Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants-Short Version [REAP-S] scores) and diet-related psychosocial measures (e.g., Three Factor Eating questionnaire) between groups were analyzed using linear mixed-effects multilevel models.

Results: At 24 wk, participants from the 5 intervention communities, compared with controls, consumed fewer calories (mean difference [MD]= -211 kcal, 95% CI: -412, -110, P = 0.039), improved overall dietary patterns measured by REAP-S scores (MD: 3.9; 95% CI: 2.26, 5.6; P < 0.001), and improved psychosocial measures (healthy eating attitudes, uncontrolled eating, cognitive restraint, and emotional eating).

Conclusions: SHHC-2.0 has strong potential to improve diet patterns and diet-related psychosocial wellbeing consistent with improved cardiovascular health. This trial was registered at www.

Clinicaltrials: gov as NCT03059472.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; community-based; diet; female adults; randomized controlled trial; rural.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CONSORT flow diagram of progress through phases of Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities-2.0 cluster randomized controlled trial. ASA24, automated self-administered 24-h dietary assessment tool.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of dietary intake with interquartile range at baseline and intervention end point (24 wk) by intervention group. The middle of the box plot represents the median Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) score (A) and Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants-short version (REAP-S) score (B), with each side representing the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile of the data) and whiskers representing 1.5 times the interquartile range below the 25th percentile and above the 75th percentile. Each dot in the figure represents HEI score (A) and REAP-S score (B) for each intervention group (in blue) and control group (in red) participant. The United States national average for HEI is 58: United States Department of Agriculture Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. HEI Scores for Americans. https://www.fns.usda.gov/hei-scores-americans. Accessed 21 July 2022. The mean REAP-S score for U.S. adults consuming a typical omnivorous diet is 32: Johnston, C.S., Bliss, C., Knurick, J.R. et al. Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants [shortened version] scores are associated with Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores and other indices of diet quality in healthy adult omnivores and vegetarians. Nutr J17, 89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0399-x.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958–1972. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30041-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. About Multiple Cause of Death, 1999–2020. CDC WONDER Online Database website. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; Atlanta, GA: 2022. https://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10.html [Internet] Available from:
    1. US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Health and Human Services . 9th ed. 2020–2025. Dietary Guidelines for Americans; p. 2020.
    1. Reedy J., Krebs-Smith S.M., Miller P.E., Liese A.D., Kahle L.L., Park Y., et al. Higher diet quality is associated with decreased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality among older adults. J. Nutr. 2014;144(6):881–889. doi: 10.3945/jn.113.189407. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nicklas T.A., O’Neil C.E., Fulgoni V.L., 3rd Diet quality is inversely related to cardiovascular risk factors in adults. J. Nutr. 2012;142(12):2112–2118. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.164889. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
admin 1
COMMUNITY 7
INTERN 2
twitter 2