Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 29;16(3):565.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16030565.

Patient-Derived Models of Cancer in the NCI PDMC Consortium: Selection, Pitfalls, and Practical Recommendations

Affiliations
Review

Patient-Derived Models of Cancer in the NCI PDMC Consortium: Selection, Pitfalls, and Practical Recommendations

Amber N Habowski et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

For over a century, early researchers sought to study biological organisms in a laboratory setting, leading to the generation of both in vitro and in vivo model systems. Patient-derived models of cancer (PDMCs) have more recently come to the forefront of preclinical cancer models and are even finding their way into clinical practice as part of functional precision medicine programs. The PDMC Consortium, supported by the Division of Cancer Biology in the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, seeks to understand the biological principles that govern the various PDMC behaviors, particularly in response to perturbagens, such as cancer therapeutics. Based on collective experience from the consortium groups, we provide insight regarding PDMCs established both in vitro and in vivo, with a focus on practical matters related to developing and maintaining key cancer models through a series of vignettes. Although every model has the potential to offer valuable insights, the choice of the right model should be guided by the research question. However, recognizing the inherent constraints in each model is crucial. Our objective here is to delineate the strengths and limitations of each model as established by individual vignettes. Further advances in PDMCs and the development of novel model systems will enable us to better understand human biology and improve the study of human pathology in the lab.

Keywords: metastasis; mouse models; organoids; patient derived models of cancer; sequencing; tumor cells; tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors declare financial interests: S.D.S. may receive royalties for PDMCs licensed by The University of Utah. R.C.S. is a consultant for Novartis and Larkspur Biosciences and on the Scientific Advisory Board of RAPPTA Therapeutics, with research funding from Cardiff Oncology and AstraZeneca. D.X.N. receives research funding from AstraZeneca. K.A.P. is a co-founder of Reveal Therapeutics; is a co-inventor for a patent for EGFRT790M mutation testing licensed to Molecular MD (through Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center); is a consultant for AstraZeneca and Jannssen; and has research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, and D2G Oncology. X.S. is a co-founder of Xilis, Inc. and a co-inventor on patents related to micro-organospheres. S.D.H. is a co-founder of Xilis, Inc. C.D.W. is a part-time consultant for LifeNet Health and has research funding from AACR-Novocure, OMS Foundation, and Varian Medical Systems. Patent # 11,789,011 (Rosalie C. Sears, Ellen M. Langer). Title: Engineered three-dimensional breast tissue, adipose tissue, and tumor disease model. The remaining authors have no conflicts to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MOSs retain patient TME. (A) Tumor spheres form rapidly in MOSs. (B) scRNA-seq of MOSs developed from lung cancer tissue retains all major cell clusters, including tumor, fibroblast, lymphoid, and myeloid cells. (C) Flow cytometry shows the presence of all major immune cell populations in MOSs. (D) Immunofluorescence shows expression of T-cell markers in MOSs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Options and considerations when selecting a PDMC. There is a diverse array of PDMCs that can be used to investigate a defined research question. PDMCs require consideration of research compliance/ethics/institute support/infrastructure that can influence model selection. Model systems are primarily split between in vitro and in vivo systems, and each has its own value and additional methodological considerations. Additional important steps include model validation, namely, quality control and credentialing (benchmarking), and eventual model sharing and publication to further advance the PDMC community and cancer biology research. Created with BioRender.com.

Similar articles

References

    1. Harrison R.G., Greenman M.J., Mall F.P., Jackson C.M. Observations of the living developing nerve fiber. Anat. Rec. 1907;1:116–128. doi: 10.1002/ar.1090010503. - DOI
    1. Carrel A. Cultivation of adult tissues and organs outside of the body. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1910;55:1379. doi: 10.1001/jama.1910.04330160047018. - DOI
    1. Carrel A., Burrows M.T. Cultivation of sarcoma outside of the body. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1910;55:1554. doi: 10.1001/jama.1910.04330180042017. - DOI
    1. Earle W.R. Production of malignancy in vitro. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1943;4:165–212.
    1. Scherer W.F., Syverton J.T., Gey G.O. Studies on the propagation in vitro of poliomyelitis viruses. J. Exp. Med. 1953;97:695–710. doi: 10.1084/jem.97.5.695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

  NODES
COMMUNITY 1
innovation 2
INTERN 2
twitter 2