This page is an archive of the Trash compactor discussion about the future of Wookieepedia's coverage of the topic(s) listed below, including whether or not to delete or redirect the relevant page(s). This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the relevant talk pages or in the Senate Hall forum rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. JangFett (Talk) 16:49, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
Naboo years
Both of these claim to have info from the Inside the Worlds of Star Wars: Episode I, but the source says nothing about any time periods or anything remotely like what these articles suggest. This could probably be handled by a CSD, but I went with a TC to be safe.
Delete
- Cade
Calrayn 06:29, November 14, 2013 (UTC) - —MJ— Council Chambers 07:14, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- As creator of one of the articles I'm ashamed to admit I think I just created it based on a redlink and the info on a different page, a terrible practice and not something I'd ever do today. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:00, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Manoof (talk) 13:48, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Fe Nite (talk) 14:12, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 14:29, November 14, 2013 (UTC) - Definitely. Corellian Premier
The Force will be with you always 19:51, November 14, 2013 (UTC) - Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:18, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- <- Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 20:57, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Per Lelal's comment below, actually. "More than" with no point of reference given... no dice. Menkooroo (talk) 23:49, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Trip391 (talk) 08:03, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- JangFett (Talk) 16:06, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:46, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Cumulonimbus Cloud (ℳeeting ℛoom) 19:40, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
Keep
Discussion
Actually, The Essential Atlas has something that relates to 5032 BBY: "The Gungans are also believed to have clashed with Naboo's first colonists—mysterious visitors who vacated the world more than five millennia ago and left only stone statues to mark their passage." This statement, however, has two problems. First, it says "five millennia ago," but from which starting point? Furthermore, it also says "more than five millennia." --LelalMekha (talk) 14:26, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- The second problem's the main reason that most of these are speculation—"more" means that there's absolutely no reason to have an article on a date. Cade Calrayn 20:23, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- I completely agree with you on that point, Cade, but what shall I write in the Naboo Elders' article? --LelalMekha (talk) 18:03, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
Jedipedia.net claims that Odan-Urr was born in 5032 BBY, citing The New Essential Chronology as source. Can someone check that? Gulomi Jomesh (talk) 14:03, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- I looked and did not see anything that backs that up. Fe Nite (talk) 17:45, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
- The Jedipedia article now seems to have been deleted with the summary, "Jedenfalls stammt es nicht aus der NEC", or "Anyway, it is not from the NEC". Also, our own FA on Odan-Urr does not give a birthdate, but just says "some time before 5,000 BBY." —MJ— Comlink 22:23, November 15, 2013 (UTC)