This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Imperators II(Talk) 07:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
== Ziem Bamas (history - links - logs - delete - protect)==Hi, I just discovered this one. The name displayed here is totally fanon. It's not mentioned in the cards at all. And I seriously doubt that the only author of this page (with his 15 edits in total) has more information from the game, that was shot down 12 years ago. Kind regards, Hk 47 (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete
- Hk 47 (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- I do want to know more about the quote "Never use your pet's name as a password, Lord Vader." Rsand 30 (talk) 19:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Supreme Emperor Holocomm 19:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Darth Vader's pet when OOM 224 (he/him) 19:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bonzane10
(holonet) 20:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC) - —spookywillowwtalk 20:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- The home page for rebelslicer.com says the quotee is "Unidentified slicer (Agents of Deception)" and not Ziem Bamas, so the name is probably fanon Rxxxxxxxxxx (talk) 14:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Rakhsh (talk) 02:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep
Comments
I am confused as to how it is known whether or not the name is fanon? If it is, then I believe that the page should be deleted; but I think some clear evidence should be presented here to show that the name does not appear in the source the page cites from. I do not know how such evidence could be presented, only that such evidence should be presented.Drour1234 (talk) 21:30, 18 September 2023 (UTC)