1932

Abstract

We review an empirical literature that studies how political polarization affects financial decisions. We first discuss the degree of partisan segregation in finance and corporate America, the mechanisms through which partisanship may influence financial decisions, and the available data sources used to infer individuals’ partisan leanings. We then describe and discuss the empirical evidence. Our review suggests an economically large and often growing partisan gap in the financial decisions of households, corporate executives, and financial intermediaries. Partisan alignment between individuals explains team and financial relationship formation, with initial evidence suggesting that high levels of partisan homogeneity may be associated with economic costs. We conclude by proposing several promising directions for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-010439
2024-11-01
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/16/1/annurev-financial-110921-010439.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-010439&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abramowitz AI. 2018.. The Great Alignment. New Haven, CT:: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aigner DJ, Cain G. 1977.. Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. . Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 30:(2):17587
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alford J, Hatemi P, Hibbing J, Martin N, Eaves L. 2011.. The politics of mate choice. . J. Politics 73:(2):36279
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arrow K. 1973.. Discrimination in labor markets. . In The Theory of Discrimination, ed. O Ashenfelter, A Rees , pp. 333. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Azzimonti M. 2014.. Partisan conflict. Work. Pap. 14-19 , Fed. Reserve Bank, Philadelphia:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker M, Egan ML, Sarkar SK. 2022.. How do investors value ESG? NBER Work. Pap. 30708
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrios JM, Hochberg YV. 2021.. Risk perceptions and politics: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. . J. Financ. Econ. 142:(2):86279
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartels LM. 2002.. Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. . Political Behav. 24:(2):11750
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Becker G. 1957.. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernstein A, Billings SB, Gustafson MT, Lewis R. 2022.. Partisan residential sorting on climate change risk. . J. Financ. Econ. 146:(3):9891015
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhagwat Y, Warren NL, Beck JT, Watson GFI. 2020.. Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. . J. Mark. 84:(5):112
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohren JA, Haggag K, Imas A, Pope DG. 2023.. Inaccurate statistical discrimination: an identification problem. . Rev. Econ. Stat. In press. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01367
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonaparte Y, Kumar A, Page JK. 2017.. Political climate, optimism, and investment decisions. . J. Financ. Mark. 34::6994
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bonica A. 2016a.. Avenues of influence: on the political expenditures of corporations and their directors and executives. . Bus. Politics 18:(4):36794
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonica A. 2016b.. Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: public version 2.0. Database, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:. https://data.stanford.edu/dime
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown JR, Cantoni E, Enos RD, Pons V. 2023.. The increase in partisan segregation in the United States. Discuss. Pap. 2023-09 , Nottingham Interdiscip. Cent. Econ. Political Res., Nottingham, UK:
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Campbell A, Converse PE, Miller WE, Stokes DE. 1960.. The American Voter. New York:: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cassidy W, Kempf E. 2023.. Partisan corporate speech. Work. Pap. , Wash. Univ. St. Louis/Harvard Bus. Sch.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cassidy W, Vorsatz B. 2024.. Partisanship and portfolio choice: evidence from mutual funds. Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago, Chicago, IL:
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cen X, Qiu Y, Wang TY. 2022.. Corporate social responsibility and employee retention. Work. Pap. , Texas A&M Univ./Temple Univ./Univ. Minn.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohen A, Hazan M, Tallarita R, Weiss D. 2019.. The politics of CEOs. . J. Leg. Anal. 11::145
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Colonnelli E, McQuade T, Ramos G, Rauter T, Xiong O. 2023.. Polarizing corporations: Does talent flow to good firms? NBER Work. Pap. 31913
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Colonnelli E, Pinho Neto V, Teso E. 2022.. Politics at work. NBER Work. Pap. 30182
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Conway J, Boxell L. 2024.. Consuming values. Work. Pap. , Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cookson JA, Engelberg JE, Mullins W. 2020.. Does partisanship shape investor beliefs? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. . Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 10:(4):86393
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. D'Acunto F, Ghosh P, Rossi AG. 2021.. Political partisanship and the transmission of fiscal policy. Work. Pap. , Georgetown Univ./Indian Inst. Manag.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dagostino R, Gao J, Ma P. 2023.. Partisanship in loan pricing. . J. Financ. Econ. 150::103717
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L. 2014.. Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. . J. Financ. Econ. 111:(1):15880
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Doherty C. 2017.. Key takeaways on Americans' growing partisan divide over political values. Rep., Pew Res. Cent., Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Donaldson JR, Malenko N, Piacentino G. 2020.. Deadlock on the board. . Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:(10):444588
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Duchin R, Farroukh AEK, Harford J, Patel T. 2021.. The economic effects of political polarization: evidence from the real asset market. Work. Pap. , Boston Coll./Ind. Univ./Univ. Wash./South. Methodist Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Engelberg J, Guzman J, Lu R, Mullins W. 2023a.. Partisan entrepreneurship. . J. Finance. In press. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3821106
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Engelberg J, Henriksson M, Manela A, Williams J. 2023b.. The partisanship of financial regulators. . Rev. Financ. Stud. 36::4373416
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Engelberg J, Lu R, Mullins W, Townsend RR. 2023c.. Political sentiment and innovation: evidence from patenters. NBER Work. Pap. 31619
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Evans R, Prado M, Rizzo A, Zambrana R. 2024.. Identity, diversity, and team performance: evidence from U.S. mutual funds. . Manag. Sci. In press. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00544
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Fehder D, Teodoridis F, Raffiee J, Lu J. 2024.. The partisanship of American inventors. . Res. Policy 53:(7):105034
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ. 2008.. Political polarization in the American public. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11::56388
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fos V, Kempf E, Tsoutsoura M. 2024.. The political polarization of corporate America. NBER Work. Pap. 30183
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Funk C, Kennedy B. 2016.. The politics of climate. Rep., Pew Res. Cent., Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Gaines BJ, Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Peyton B, Verkuilen J. 2007.. Same facts, different interpretations: partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. . J. Politics 69:(4):95774
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gentzkow M. 2016.. Polarization in 2016. White Pap., Toulouse Netw. Inf. Technol., Toulouse, Fr.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, Taddy M. 2019.. Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: method and application to congressional speech. . Econometrica 87:(4):130740
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gerber AS, Huber GA. 2009.. Partisanship and economic behavior: Do partisan differences in economic forecasts predict real economic behavior?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 103:(3):40726
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Giglio S, Maggiori M, Stroebel J, Tan Z, Utkus S, Xu X. 2023.. Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios. NBER Work. Pap. 31114
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Giglio S, Maggiori M, Stroebel J, Utkus S. 2021.. Five facts about beliefs and portfolios. . Am. Econ. Rev. 111:(5):1481522
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gillitzer C, Prasad N. 2018.. The effect of consumer sentiment on consumption: cross-sectional evidence from elections. . Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 10:(4):23469
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Goldberg MS. 1982.. Discrimination, nepotism, and long-run wage differentials. . Q. J. Econ. 97:(2):30719
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Goldman E, Gupta N, Israelsen RD. 2024.. Political polarization in financial news. . J. Financ. Econ. 155::103816
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gordon SC, Hafer C, Landa D. 2007.. Consumption or investment? On motivations for political giving. . J. Politics 69:(4):105772
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gormley TA, Jha M, Wang M. 2024.. The politicization of social responsibility. Work. Pap. , Wash. Univ. St. Louis/Ga. State Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gormley TA, Kaviani M, Maleki H. 2024.. When do judges throw the book at companies? The influence of partisanship in corporate prosecutions. Work. Pap. , Wash. Univ. St. Louis/Univ. Del./Rutgers Bus. Sch.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Guzman J, Kacperczyk AO. 2019.. Gender gap in entrepreneurship. . Res. Policy 48:(7):166680
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hill SJ, Huber GA. 2017.. Representativeness and motivations of the contemporary donorate: results from merged survey and administrative records. . Political Behav. 39:(1):329
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Homroy S, Gangopadhyay S. 2023.. Strategic CEO activism in polarized markets. . J. Financ. Quant. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109023001382
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hong H, Kostovetsky L. 2012.. Red and blue investing: values and finance. . J. Financ. Econ. 103:(1):119
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Huber GA, Malhotra N. 2017.. Political homophily in social relationships: evidence from online dating behavior. . J. Politics 79:(1):26983
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hutton I, Jiang D, Kumar A. 2014.. Corporate policies of Republican managers. . J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 49:(5/6):1279310
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Igielnik R, Keeter S, Kennedy C, Spahn B. 2018.. Commercial voter files and the study of U.S. politics. Rep., Pew Res. Cent., Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Iyengar S, Konitzer T, Tedin K. 2018.. The home as a political fortress: family agreement in an era of polarization. . J. Politics 80:(4):132638
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ. 2019.. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22::12946
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Iyengar S, Sood G, Lelkes Y. 2012.. Affect, not ideology. . Public Opin. Q. 76:(3):40531
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Iyengar S, Westwood SJ. 2015.. Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. . Am. J. Political Sci. 59:(3):690707
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jha S, Koudijs P, Salgado M. 2024.. Markets under siege: how political beliefs move financial markets. Res. Pap. 4012, Grad. Sch. Bus., Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Jiang D, Kumar A, Law KKF. 2016.. Political contributions and analyst behavior. . Rev. Account. Stud. 21:(1):3788
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kaustia M, Torstila S. 2011.. Stock market aversion? Political preferences and stock market participation. . J. Financ. Econ. 100:(1):98112
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kaviani MS, Li L, Maleki H. 2023.. Media, partisan ideology, and corporate social responsibility. Work. Pap., Univ. Del./Villanova Univ./Rutgers Bus. Sch.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Kempf E, Luo M, Schäfer L, Tsoutsoura M. 2023.. Political ideology and international capital allocation. . J. Financ. Econ. 148:(2):15073
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kempf E, Tsoutsoura M. 2021.. Partisan professionals: evidence from credit rating analysts. . J. Finance 76:(6):280556
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kim SS, Fraga B. 2022.. When do voter files accurately measure turnout? How transitory voter file snapshots impact research and representation. APSA Preprint. https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2022-qr0gd
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Layman GC, Carsey TM, Horowitz JM. 2006.. Party polarization in American politics: characteristics, causes, and consequences. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 9::83110
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lee FE. 2015.. How party polarization affects governance. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 18::26182
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Lee J, Lee KJ, Nagarajan NJ. 2014.. Birds of a feather: value implications of political alignment between top management and directors. . J. Financ. Econ. 112:(2):23250
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lelkes Y. 2016.. Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements. . Public Opin. Q. 80:(Suppl. 1):392410
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Luo M, Manconi A, Massa M. 2023.. Political affiliation and media distrust: evidence from stock market investors. Work. Pap. , Erasmus Univ./Bocconi Univ./INSEAD
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Mason L. 2015.. I disrespectfully agree: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. . Am. J. Political Sci. 59::12845
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. McCartney WB, Orellana-Li J, Zhang C. 2024.. Political polarization affects households' financial decisions: evidence from home sales. . J. Finance 79::795841
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. McConnell C, Margalit Y, Malhotra N, Levendusky M. 2018.. The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. . Am. J. Political Sci. 62::518
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. McGrath MC. 2017.. Economic behavior and the partisan perceptual screen. . Q. J. Political Sci. 11:(4):36383
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Meeuwis M, Parker JA, Schoar A, Simester DI. 2022.. Belief disagreement and portfolio choice. . J. Finance 77:(6):3191247
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mian A, Sufi A, Khoshkhou N. 2023.. Partisan bias, economic expectations, and household spending. . Rev. Econ. Stat. 105::493510
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Mummolo J, Nall C. 2017.. Why partisans do not sort: the constraints on political segregation. . J. Politics 79:(1):4559
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mutz DC, Mondak JJ. 2006.. The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. . J. Politics 68:(1):14055
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Oxford Univ. Press. 2000.. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Pan Y, Pikulina E, Siegel S, Wang TY. 2024.. Political divide and the composition of households' equity portfolios. Work. Pap. , Univ. Utah/Univ. B. C./Univ. Wash./Univ. Minn.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Phelps ES. 1972.. The statistical theory of racism and sexism. . Am. Econ. Rev. 62:(4):65961
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Prior M. 2013.. Media and political polarization. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 16::10127
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Rice A. 2023.. Executive partisanship and corporate investment. . J. Financ. Quant. Anal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109023000546
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Sheng J, Sun Z, Wang W. 2023.. Partisan return gap: the polarized stock market in the time of a pandemic. . Manag. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4913
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Volkens A, Lehmann P, Matthieß T, Merz N, Regel S, Weßels B. 2018.. The Manifesto Data Collection, version 2018a. Database, Wiss. Sozialforsch., Berlin:
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Vorsatz B. 2022.. Costs of political polarization: evidence from mutual fund managers during COVID-19. Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago, Chicago, IL:
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Wintoki MB, Xi Y. 2020.. Partisan bias in fund portfolios. . J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 55:(5):171754
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wu Y, Zechner J. 2024.. Political preferences and financial market equilibrium. Work. Pap. , Univ. Or./Vienna Univ. Econ. Bus.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-010439
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-010439
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
  NODES
HOME 5
innovation 3
Intern 3
iOS 12
mac 3
Note 1
os 157
text 5
Theorie 2
web 2